On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Sherif Ramadan
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Daniel Brown wrote:
>> So as long as you want to run lead on it, Sherif, and it's
>> something we can easily disable entirely, should some unforeseen
>> consequences arise as a result of the new voting/
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Maciek Sokolewicz
wrote:
> The reason I'm using such "strict" guidelines is simply
> to make the manual notes readable. If you look at a page such as
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.strtotime.php, there are > 100 notes
> present. Trying to find something u
I can't tell if this is a "humor fail" or not.
But if you could kindly link more often to example.com, our associates
would greately appreciate and return the favor by linking to php.net
to as so increase your leads and revenues, assuring you a more
successful business enterprise.
;)
On Fri,
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Keryx Web wrote:
Hi
Today I polluted the internals list with an off topic remark about
Front End code quality. I quote myself:
[Off topic rant]
I am constantly amazed that some PHP-wizards, whose knowledge of
back-end development clearly shows in how many ways I m
On Jan 27, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Mehdi Achour wrote:
Hello internals,
I've been helping with PHP documentation for 4 years now, and I
still can't help the fact that a lt of things are not
documented, that our/my way of handling the PHP documentation
update is not accurate, nor productive, n
On Sunday, August 31, 2003, at 06:48 AM, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Anyone motivated to add this to the docs? Would be nice to check
first... I have no FreeBSD...
Goba
From: Greg Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I hereby grant publication privileges to include this procedure,
found in the attached
On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 08:45 AM, Mehdi Achour wrote:
Ronald Chmara wrote:
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 08:56 AM, Mehdi Achour wrote:
It tends to vary over time. When people are very active, the notes
are well maintained. Sometimes people become less active. From what I
can see, I
.
I don't think that this means the notes are "weak", I think it means
that the manual is weak.
Ronald Chmara
Ronin Professional Consulting LLC
678-530-9542
"Shall we play a game?" --Joshua
or all of these (or apply existing
ones), but to what end? If the end product is a good manual, annotated
and then improved as needed, how will it help reach that goal if each
note submission/rejection/deletion/integration requires more work?
Especially since the manual is still filled with not
g him for his add-on.
When rejecting :
- support : a note asking for help
Uhm, see above?
Here's how I think of the notes:
Unless it helps *me* somehow, someday, it doesn't belong.
-Bop
Ronald Chmara, Ronin Professional Consulting LLC
520-326-6109, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A strange game. T
the docs.
I had found that an amazing amount of note content can be summarized in
just a few more lines of documentation, or an additional line (or
three) of example code.
-Bop
Ronald Chmara
Ronin Professional Consulting LLC
"Never send a human to do a machine's job." --Agent Smith, &
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 03:13 AM, Zak Greant wrote:
Heh. The content is already in docbook and the user notes are mostly
useless already. ;)
*wakes from a long slumber*
Depends on coding style (the notes), doesn't it? I used to bitch about
PHP2->3 migrations, now I have 3->4, and
12 matches
Mail list logo