What do you all think about categorizing SPL?
Browsing ~50 classes and exceptions and 7 interfaces is a lot..
I'd like to move Iterators into its own , Exceptions (when they
get committed) into one, and datastructures into one.
That leaves SplFileInfo and ArrayObject (maybe others) free standin
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Hannes Magnusson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What do you all think about categorizing SPL?
>
> Browsing ~50 classes and exceptions and 7 interfaces is a lot..
>
> I'd like to move Iterators into its own , Exceptions (when they
> get committed) in
2008/11/14 Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all
>
> What do you all think about categorizing SPL?
>
> Browsing ~50 classes and exceptions and 7 interfaces is a lot..
>
> I'd like to move Iterators into its own , Exceptions (when they
> get committed) into one, and datastructures into one.
Em Sex, 2008-11-14 às 21:31 +0100, Hannes Magnusson escreveu:
> Hi all
>
> What do you all think about categorizing SPL?
>
> Browsing ~50 classes and exceptions and 7 interfaces is a lot..
>
> I'd like to move Iterators into its own , Exceptions (when they
> get committed) into one, and datastru
Hi all
What do you all think about categorizing SPL?
Browsing ~50 classes and exceptions and 7 interfaces is a lot..
I'd like to move Iterators into its own , Exceptions (when they
get committed) into one, and datastructures into one.
That leaves SplFileInfo and ArrayObject (maybe others) free s
