Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> BTW it would be nice to get other's opinions, especially now that Derick
> cc-ed the development list :)
I would like grouped extension list with alphabetical extension list
(current Function Reference) in Appendix.
Jakub Vrana
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
I actually think that this grouping doesn't really help as it's pretty
hard to find documentation by extension now as they are no longer sorted
alphabetically. Now people first need to find the correct category and
*then* the correct extension. I think this new categorization th
I actually think that this grouping doesn't really help as it's pretty
hard to find documentation by extension now as they are no longer sorted
alphabetically. Now people first need to find the correct category and
*then* the correct extension. I think this new categorization thing only
makes thing
Derick Rethans wrote:
> I actually think that this grouping doesn't really help as it's pretty
> hard to find documentation by extension now as they are no longer sorted
> alphabetically. Now people first need to find the correct category and
> *then* the correct extension. I think this new categor
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Now it would be nice to discuss two things:
>
>- whether these categories are fine
>- whether the reference sections are categorized in the right
> places or not
>
> After we finalize the categorization, we can put the category names to
> enti
Cheers,
Today with good cooperation from the guys on phpdoc#, we made the
grouped function listing (RFC/manual.xml.in) work in livedocs. With
introducing a simple new grouping tag, this change needs our own DTD
(which is based on DocBook), but I beleive it is worth this small change.
Check out
