Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2008-01-07 Thread Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson
On Jan 7, 2008 1:00 PM, Hannes Magnusson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 12:01 AM, Brett Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Here is a patch to add the PECL SPPLUS extension to the manual. Thanks > > to Hannes for helping me get this patch ready - hopefully I haven't > > mis

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2008-01-07 Thread Hannes Magnusson
On Jan 3, 2008 12:01 AM, Brett Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here is a patch to add the PECL SPPLUS extension to the manual. Thanks > to Hannes for helping me get this patch ready - hopefully I haven't > missed anything. > I was not able to test on my machine here at work, but I'll try a

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2008-01-02 Thread Brett Bieber
Here is a patch to add the PECL SPPLUS extension to the manual. Thanks to Hannes for helping me get this patch ready - hopefully I haven't missed anything. I was not able to test on my machine here at work, but I'll try and get a good configure.php and test run tonight - if anyone else could test

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2008-01-02 Thread Brett Bieber
On Jan 2, 2008 3:21 PM, Brett Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 30, 2007 8:11 AM, Brett Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 12/30/07, Mark Wiesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Philip Olson wrote: > > > > On Dec 29, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 3

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2008-01-02 Thread Brett Bieber
On Dec 30, 2007 8:11 AM, Brett Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/30/07, Mark Wiesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Philip Olson wrote: > > > On Dec 29, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote: > > > > > >> On 30.12.2007 02:23, Mark Wiesemann wrote: > > >>> spplus.xml doesn't seem to be e

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2007-12-30 Thread Brett Bieber
No objections from me. I'm on vacation, and the patch is on my machine at home (off). I can send it when I get home on the 2nd. But the patch is not big at all -3 or 4 functions - so if anyone is anxious and wants to convert it go right ahead. On 12/30/07, Mark Wiesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2007-12-30 Thread Mark Wiesemann
Philip Olson wrote: On Dec 29, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote: On 30.12.2007 02:23, Mark Wiesemann wrote: spplus.xml doesn't seem to be existing in phpdoc yet. Can somebody please check these files, and take care of the movement of spplus.xml? Please also consider the probably existi

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2007-12-29 Thread Philip Olson
On Dec 29, 2007, at 3:28 PM, Antony Dovgal wrote: On 30.12.2007 02:23, Mark Wiesemann wrote: spplus.xml doesn't seem to be existing in phpdoc yet. Can somebody please check these files, and take care of the movement of spplus.xml? Please also consider the probably existing translations in

Re: [PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2007-12-29 Thread Antony Dovgal
On 30.12.2007 02:23, Mark Wiesemann wrote: > spplus.xml doesn't seem to be existing in phpdoc yet. > > Can somebody please check these files, and take care of the movement of > spplus.xml? Please also consider the probably existing translations in > peardoc. I believe you can drop spplus safely a

[PHP-DOC] PECL docs: movement from peardoc to phpdoc

2007-12-29 Thread Mark Wiesemann
Hi, peardoc still contains some docs for PECL extensions: http://cvs.php.net/viewcvs.cgi/peardoc/en/pecl/ [1] 6 of the 10 files only contain a link to phpdoc (on [1] in the "Last log entry" these are marked with a star). imagick.xml, satellite.xml, session-pgsql.xml already exist in phpdoc, and