> If you have a good idea for a more descriptive title, use it. If the
> best you can find is"Example of functionname usage" I would, for
> consistency, use "functionname example".
Thanks, makes sense
> The xml:id bit is just good practice, not 'a must'.
> If you add xml:id to the example an
Hi Paul
On 9/12/07, Paul Reinheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the framework shows
> functionname example
>
> simplexml shows
> Include file example.php with XML string
>
>
>
> Which one should I be using, there are two questions here, the function tags
> surrounding the function name,
I'm planning on solving easy things for now to get my feet wet. Question
about structure,
comparing the simplexml documnet i've been working with to the structure
provided as a framework:
the framework shows
functionname example
simplexml shows
Include file example.php with XML string
W
