On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 16:10, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Christian Weiske wrote:
>
>> Hi Hannes,
>>
>>
> But that is the only difference?
Yes.
>>>
>>> I don't see any explicit mention of the vendor directory must being
>>> lowercase (although all examples ar
On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Christian Weiske wrote:
Hi Hannes,
But that is the only difference?
Yes.
I don't see any explicit mention of the vendor directory must being
lowercase (although all examples are lowercased)..
That was consensus - lowercasity is to distinguish between "normal"
Hi Hannes,
> >> But that is the only difference?
> > Yes.
>
> I don't see any explicit mention of the vendor directory must being
> lowercase (although all examples are lowercased)..
That was consensus - lowercasity is to distinguish between "normal" directories
(i.e. class dirs) and namespace
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:09, Christian Weiske wrote:
> Hallo Hannes,
>
>
>> >> The directory structure is compatible with the intheworks namespace naming
>> >> convention cs, right?
>> >> (Meaning if we move to namespaces no change is needed)
>> > No. The new namespace convention would mean that
Hallo Hannes,
> >> The directory structure is compatible with the intheworks namespace naming
> >> convention cs, right?
> >> (Meaning if we move to namespaces no change is needed)
> > No. The new namespace convention would mean that - if we chose phd as
> > namespace (note, lowercase!), the dir
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:47, Christian Weiske wrote:
> Hi Bjori,
>
>
>> The directory structure is compatible with the intheworks namespace naming
>> convention cs, right?
>> (Meaning if we move to namespaces no change is needed)
> No. The new namespace convention would mean that - if we chose ph
Hi Bjori,
> The directory structure is compatible with the intheworks namespace naming
> convention cs, right?
> (Meaning if we move to namespaces no change is needed)
No. The new namespace convention would mean that - if we chose phd as namespace
(note, lowercase!), the directory wouldn't be Ph
The directory structure is compatible with the intheworks namespace naming
convention cs, right?
(Meaning if we move to namespaces no change is needed)
Shame we loose the history... but this needs to be done
-Hannes
On Jun 15, 2009 7:22 p.m., "Christian Weiske" wrote:
Hi all, especially bjori,
Hi all, especially bjori,
My proposed renamings for the classes are:
> http://tmp.cweiske.de/phd-moveclasses
Any objections?
#!/bin/sh
#copy phd classes around
#make sure you are in phd/
mkdir PhD
mkdir PhD/Format
mkdir PhD/Format/Abstract
mkdir PhD/Reader
mkdir PhD/Theme
mkdir PhD/Theme/PEAR
