[group@: this is the end of thread]

[phpdoc@: please read and digest]

This is turning into a pissing contest; I certainly don't have time for
that.  Derick restricted the karma because more than one person had made
changes without discussing them, which then had to be reverted.

This is not a dig at you personally, Moshe.

Don't think I enjoy this; Ego and the trouble it causes is massive
pain in the ass--it's already wasted too much of our time today;
you could have been writing code instead of complaining, and I could
have been doing likewise instead of trying to put you at ease.

The Karma will stick until we see a couple of patches coming in and
being discussed.  I'm now officially around on phpdoc@ and will look
at the patches.  

Now, quit complaining and get coding ;-)

--Wez.



moshe wrote:
> Wez wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 May 2004, moshe doron wrote:
> > > > i need access for livedocs for rtl support.
> > > > right now i did the initial work and publish it on the doc group, 
> > > > but rtl still require tunings. limiting my access (i'm not taking 
> > > > this personaly even if i need ;)) will kill any future 
> > progress in 
> > > > this area just because i'm the only one that work on rtl 
> > and i'm too 
> > > > busy (just like you all) begging after livedoc team to commit my 
> > > > patchs.
> > 
> > I think you're over-exaggerating; there are enough people 
> > with karma to commit any good patches that are presented.
> 
> my experience show that you have to ask and ask again for someone that
> will do the job for you.  Anyway I don't said it became impossible, just
> said it make the work much less attractive. And much more time
> consuming.
> 
> > > Limiting access was needed because people were committing to it 
> > > without discussing at all. Unless that's done adequately we're not 
> > > adding any more people to livedoc's accesslist.
> > 
> > I've seen a few "none-core" livedocs people making commits 
> > and then being asked to revert them recently; it does get 
> > annoying because it is totally unnecessary--it can be avoided 
> > by talking about it first. CVS is a useful tool, but only if 
> > you don't clog it up with noise from reverts and whitespace commits.
> > 
> > Here are a couple of good reasons why you should discuss 
> > before you commit, that apply in general to OpenSource:
> > 
> > 1: Things work in a particular way for a reason that might 
> > not be clear
> >    to you, and you might accidentally break something.
> > 
> > 2: Things might be planned to go in a particular direction 
> > and you might
> >    not be aware of it.
> > 
> > 3: Discussing gives others a chance to review your code and help spot
> >    any silly mistakes; QA is good.
> > 
> > OpenSource only works if people are working (more or less) 
> > towards the same purpose.  If people are not operating 
> > (roughly) within these guidelines, we will end up with a mess.
> > 
> > So, although I feel that karma restriction might be a little 
> > over the top, I don't really mind it right now--it will force 
> > you to become good OpenSource citizens.
> > 
> > Once we see a steady stream of good patches coming in, we 
> > will grant karma, but until then we will baby-sit the code.
> > 
> 
> 0. I don't agrue about all above. and already apologize on the group.
> I respect all the efforts you all making for the php project and
> understanding livedocs restriction. My below words are intending to
> convince you giving me access, not to flaming you.
> 
> 1. I'm holding an access to the phpdoc repository for a while and afair
> never run into those conflicts.
> 
> 2. while I have a lot of plans and improvment ideas I keep not to start
> massing when I suspect if my time 'll not allow me completing the task.
> 
> 3. I have a reason to believe that some of you may enjoy smoothly using
> livedoc on cygwin (my patch):
> I did this patch without knowing that I have write access to livedocs, I
> posted it to the group but no one response. I waited some days and email
> some of you but still no response .After some days I see by accident
> that I have livedocs access and committed the patch.
> 
> I asking again from you to think again about your decision and give me
> livedoc access, anyway I will respect your decision.

Reply via email to