This should only be used for phpweb, right? (not 'html' for example)
Yep. HTML should be working without any PHP setup. It can in fact be
used to get help setting up PHP..
I don't think we speak about the same thing now.
What I want to do is to use highlight_string when building the manual, so
tha
> > This should only be used for phpweb, right? (not 'html' for example)
>
> Yep. HTML should be working without any PHP setup. It can in fact be
> used to get help setting up PHP..
I don't think we speak about the same thing now.
What I want to do is to use highlight_string when building the man
Well, I have no time for this now, so you're welcome ;))
I'll do it, but I'm not completely happy with the results of the present
colorize.php-script, so I will spend some time on it first until I'm
satisfied.
This should only be used for phpweb, right? (not 'html' for example)
Yep. HTML should be
> Well, it would be nice. I have already done this for the special CHM
> version, and it was discussed that some enhancemenets from there will be
> added to the online manual.
>
> However this coloring can be done on-the-fly with highlight_string()...
Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind.
> Wel
While trying to learn DocBook and the other pets that we use to generate the
manual, I stumbled across the colorize.php-script that can be found in
cvs/peardoc.
Why don't we use that script in our manual (well, atleast when building
phpweb).
It only matches , which will be generated when doing
,
While trying to learn DocBook and the other pets that we use to generate the
manual, I stumbled across the colorize.php-script that can be found in
cvs/peardoc.
Why don't we use that script in our manual (well, atleast when building
phpweb).
It only matches , which will be generated when doing
,
