On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 16:45, Christian Weiske wrote:
> Hi Bjori,
>
>
>> > Though we could go toward XHTML 5 variant of the new spec if we
>> > want the documents to be XML parsable.
>>
>> No need for the rendered docs to be XML parsable, if you need to do
>> some magic against the docs then use
Hi Bjori,
> > Though we could go toward XHTML 5 variant of the new spec if we
> > want the documents to be XML parsable.
>
> No need for the rendered docs to be XML parsable, if you need to do
> some magic against the docs then use the DocBook XML.
> There shouldn't be any massive work needed to
On Dec 24, 2008, at 6:49 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
No need for the rendered docs to be XML parsable, if you need to do
some magic against the docs then use the DocBook XML.
Good point and in fact, I've changed my mind on the need for totally
valid XHTML...
I'll keep watching the list for
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 05:26, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Hi Hannes:
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:10:28PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
>> It is a tough problem. Be anal about validation or just scrw it, along
>> as it works properly - or should we simply drop the whole xhtml stuff
>> and move
Hi Hannes:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:10:28PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> PhD does try to be as xhtml compliant as it can. There are several
> cases which we simply cannot fix, but others that simply have been an
> oversight.
Ja. Cool.
> It is a tough problem. Be anal about validation
Hello all,
> > Do you have one documented? I do a lot of XSLT-type stuff and it
> > seems to me that if we're starting with valid XML (.manual.xml) and
> > XHTML is in many respects HTML XMLified that it should be
> > possible...
> The problem is like:
>
> some text
>
> the example title
> Exam
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 23:21, G. T. Stresen-Reuter
wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
>> There are several cases which we simply cannot fix
>
> Do you have one documented? I do a lot of XSLT-type stuff and it seems to me
> that if we're starting with valid XML (.manua
On Dec 23, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
There are several cases which we simply cannot fix
Do you have one documented? I do a lot of XSLT-type stuff and it
seems to me that if we're starting with valid XML (.manual.xml) and
XHTML is in many respects HTML XMLified that it shoul
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 21:46, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:57:46PM +0800, Gang Chen wrote:
>>
>> $header = <<> > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
>
> Has there been discussion of making this, and all (relevant) PhD output,
> XHTML compliant? I can go throu
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:57:46PM +0800, Gang Chen wrote:
>
> $header = << "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
Has there been discussion of making this, and all (relevant) PhD output,
XHTML compliant? I can go through the code and make it so (or at least
closer).
>
>
> $t
10 matches
Mail list logo
