Just document the preferred way to use any function.
Like in this case, the correct way is to use all parameters:
If the documentation points out more than one syntax, I consider it
confusing to not provide that optional syntax as one of the prototypes.
The way I see it either remove the refe
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 16:15, Philip Olson wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, John Coggeshall wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:33, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just document the preferred way to use any function.
> > > > Like in t
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, John Coggeshall wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:33, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> > >
> > > Just document the preferred way to use any function.
> > > Like in this case, the correct way is to use all parameters:
> > >
> > >
derick Fri Jun 6 17:20:40 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions implode.xml
Log:
- Document implode() properly
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions/implode.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions/implode.xml:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, John Coggeshall wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 15:33, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> >
> > Just document the preferred way to use any function.
> > Like in this case, the correct way is to use all parameters:
> >
> > string implode (string glue, array pieces)
>
> If the d
johnFri Jun 6 15:47:18 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions implode.xml
Log:
Revert back to 1.6
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions/implode.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions/implode.xml:1.7
phpdoc
Just document the preferred way to use any function.
Like in this case, the correct way is to use all parameters:
string implode (string glue, array pieces)
--Jani
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Philip Olson wrote:
>
>I think you should revert this revert. It's not our
>fault
+1
Goba
Philip Olson írta:
I think you should revert this revert. It's not our
fault that implode() has such a screwy prototype, we
can only document it/them.
There are other functions with multiple prototypes as
it's how we do it. Your initial change looks fully
appropriate, see also min() a
I think you should revert this revert. It's not our
fault that implode() has such a screwy prototype, we
can only document it/them.
There are other functions with multiple prototypes as
it's how we do it. Your initial change looks fully
appropriate, see also min() and strtr().
Also, it shoul
johnFri Jun 6 11:54:48 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions implode.xml
Log:
Following Jani's Suggestion on a more appropiate proto.
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions/implode.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/s
Eh..did you read the manual page before you screwed it up?
It should read:
string implode ([string glue,] array pieces)
Read the Note: on the page..and check explode() proto.
Having two different protos for same function is only
gonna cause confusion.
--Jan
johnFri Jun 6 07:27:15 2003 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions implode.xml
Log:
Clearified the proto for this function per bug #24056
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions/implode.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/str
philip Fri Jun 7 13:46:27 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions implode.xml
Log:
Minor update to example, removed see also to the alias join().
Index: phpdoc/en/reference/strings/functions/implode.xml
diff -u phpdoc/en/refere
13 matches
Mail list logo
