[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] iconv-extension

2002-10-08 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:43:42 +0900 > Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Gabor Hojtsy wrote: >> >>>What php-dev guys think about this? >>> >>>Goba >> >>Except there may be some lib detection problems on some >>platforms. It's stable, IMO. > > > Without spec

[PHP-DOC] Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-DOC] iconv-extension

2002-10-08 Thread Pierre-Alain Joye
On Tue, 08 Oct 2002 23:43:42 +0900 Yasuo Ohgaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > What php-dev guys think about this? > > > > Goba > > Except there may be some lib detection problems on some > platforms. It's stable, IMO. Without specify anything detection failed on RH7.3 (l

Re: [PHP-DOC] iconv-extension

2002-10-08 Thread Yasuo Ohgaki
tz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:06 PM > Subject: [PHP-DOC] iconv-extension > > > >>Sources state iconv extensions as experimental. Is this (still) correct? >>If so, I'll add the appropriat

Re: [PHP-DOC] iconv-extension

2002-10-08 Thread Gabor Hojtsy
What php-dev guys think about this? Goba - Original Message - From: "Friedhelm Betz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: [PHP-DOC] iconv-extension > > Sources state iconv extensions as experimen

[PHP-DOC] iconv-extension

2002-10-08 Thread Friedhelm Betz
Sources state iconv extensions as experimental. Is this (still) correct? If so, I'll add the appropriate notes in the docs. Friedhelm -- PHP Documentation Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php