Folks:
It would be neat if people on the doc team could subscribe to a page so
the person could be notified when new comments are made. This will be
helpful for someone who has edited the page and/or culled the existing
user notes so the person can edit/curate comments as they come in.
--Dan
Well, I like to start by looking at the existing system.
So from a quick analysis, the types of user notes we currently see
are:
Comments to enhance the documentation: i.e. expanded code examples,
use cases.
It's tough to come up with [most] all possible subcategories here but
notes abou
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 13:46, Juliette wrote:
> Voting, I agree would be very useful. It should be possible to vote down a
> comment also imo, let the negative votes of users tell us which comments
> might need attention. And the high scoring comments will hopefully be the
> most useful.
We do ha
Hi
2009/3/28 Philip Olson
>
> We've discussed our comment system a few times but let's finally do
> something about it. Let's first discuss what our ideal user interactive
> system would be, then design a system while keeping in mind our resource
> limitations.
>
Well, I like to start by looking
I too feel compelled to participate in this thread...
On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
2009/3/31 Philip Olson :
As far as using a "fancy" looking comment system, I would vote for
it.
Everything is going "web 2.0" with the "ooohhh" and "ahhh"s (gmail
is a
prime example,
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Richard Quadling
wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Philip Olson :
> >
> >> Even though I don't actively contribute I still hope I can put my 2
> cents
> >> into here:
> >
> > Of course, and by posting you are being active :)
> >
>
I actually feel welcomed here. It's a strange feel
2009/3/31 Philip Olson :
>
>> Even though I don't actively contribute I still hope I can put my 2 cents
>> into here:
>
> Of course, and by posting you are being active :)
>
>> As far as using a "fancy" looking comment system, I would vote for it.
>> Everything is going "web 2.0" with the "ooohhh"
Even though I don't actively contribute I still hope I can put my 2
cents into here:
Of course, and by posting you are being active :)
As far as using a "fancy" looking comment system, I would vote for
it. Everything is going "web 2.0" with the "ooohhh" and "ahhh"s
(gmail is a prime exam
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On 28 Mar 2009, at 07:41, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> - http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/chapter01/
>>>
>>
>> Sounds neat. BUT, it seems they've gotten too big for
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h738/text
I like it, and this approach is another option to consider while
dreaming up our ideal system.
If you page down a little, you come to the text where each line the
cursor is over presents a comment op along with a link to that
specific line of
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:26:46AM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2009, at 07:41, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
>> Even if it was working, the whole thing requires JavaScript, limiting
>> availability of the comments in some situations.
>
> I don't buy this argument and prefer we innovate and n
On 28 Mar 2009, at 08:44, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
Hi Daniel
2009/3/28 Daniel Convissor :
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
- http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/chapter01/
Sounds neat. BUT, it seems they've gotten too big for their
britches.
It isn't wor
On 28 Mar 2009, at 07:41, Daniel Convissor wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
- http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/chapter01/
Sounds neat. BUT, it seems they've gotten too big for their britches.
It isn't working for me. I don't see any comment bubbles or
Hi Daniel
2009/3/28 Daniel Convissor :
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>>
>> - http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/chapter01/
>
> Sounds neat. BUT, it seems they've gotten too big for their britches.
> It isn't working for me. I don't see any comment bubbles or hav
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> - http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/chapter01/
Sounds neat. BUT, it seems they've gotten too big for their britches.
It isn't working for me. I don't see any comment bubbles or have the
ability to click in the "gutter" to init
On 3/27/09, Philip Olson wrote:
> Hello fellow documentation geeks,
>
> We've discussed our comment system a few times but let's finally do
> something about it. Let's first discuss what our ideal user
> interactive system would be, then design a system while keeping in
> mind our resource limitat
Hello fellow documentation geeks,
We've discussed our comment system a few times but let's finally do
something about it. Let's first discuss what our ideal user
interactive system would be, then design a system while keeping in
mind our resource limitations.
So, if we want a system desig
17 matches
Mail list logo
