2010/10/22 Hannes Magnusson :
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:33, Alexey Shein wrote:
>>> These are kindof intentionally duplicated. Although extensions.ent
>>> could use the entities from language-defs.ent I don't think its worth
>>> "fixing"
>>>
>>> -Hannes
>>>
>>
>> It's always better having to ma
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:33, Alexey Shein wrote:
>> These are kindof intentionally duplicated. Although extensions.ent
>> could use the entities from language-defs.ent I don't think its worth
>> "fixing"
>>
>> -Hannes
>>
>
> It's always better having to make changes in 1 place than 2,
> especial
> These are kindof intentionally duplicated. Although extensions.ent
> could use the entities from language-defs.ent I don't think its worth
> "fixing"
>
> -Hannes
>
It's always better having to make changes in 1 place than 2,
especially for translators like me :)
If you explain what have to be do
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 15:58, Alexey Shein wrote:
> 2010/10/18 Hannes Magnusson :
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 15:46, Alexey Shein wrote:
>>> Greetings, everybody.
>>> While translating, I've found a lot of duplication between
>>> extensions.ent and language-defs.ent files. Should they be merged
>
Any news here?
--
Regards,
Shein Alexey
2010/10/18 Hannes Magnusson :
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 15:46, Alexey Shein wrote:
>> Greetings, everybody.
>> While translating, I've found a lot of duplication between
>> extensions.ent and language-defs.ent files. Should they be merged
>> somehow or contain cross-links to avoid duplication?
>
>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 15:46, Alexey Shein wrote:
> Greetings, everybody.
> While translating, I've found a lot of duplication between
> extensions.ent and language-defs.ent files. Should they be merged
> somehow or contain cross-links to avoid duplication?
Which duplication exactly?
-Hannes
