I'am absolutly +1 with these ideas, that are very clear.
Regards,
J.Pauli
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Oct 11, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
>> My example was http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.predefined.php
>>
>> I have other examples of w
On Oct 11, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> My example was http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.predefined.php
>
> I have other examples of what I globally mean, these kinds are recurrent :
>
> - "Note: The null type was introduced in PHP 4."
> - "Warning : Before PHP 4.3
My example was http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.predefined.php
I have other examples of what I globally mean, these kinds are recurrent :
- "Note: The null type was introduced in PHP 4."
- "Warning : Before PHP 4.3.0, appending to an array in which the
current maximum key was n
On Oct 11, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> Ok, so we put away all PHP4 terms from docs which mix PHP4 ans PHP5 ?
Not sure what you mean. If decided, we'll remove them. Maybe you have an
example or three?
> What to do for docs like "Predifined Variables" which highly rely on PHP 4
> (r
On Oct 11, 2010, at 3:51 AM, Richard Quadling wrote:
> On 23 January 2010 07:25, Philip Olson wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> What do people think about making PHP 5 a first class citizen? If done, we'd
>> no longer have phrases like:
>>
>> - As of PHP 5
>> - Since PHP 5
>> - Added in PHP
On 23 January 2010 07:25, Philip Olson wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> What do people think about making PHP 5 a first class citizen? If done, we'd
> no longer have phrases like:
>
> - As of PHP 5
> - Since PHP 5
> - Added in PHP 5
>
> Because readers are expected to be using PHP 5. However, I'm
Ok, so we put away all PHP4 terms from docs which mix PHP4 ans PHP5 ?
What to do for docs like "Predifined Variables" which highly rely on PHP 4
(register globals switch) ?
J.Pauli
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
>
> > I'
On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Julien Pauli wrote:
> I'm just putting back the subject here ;-)
>
> Actually translating French doc, I noticed that few days ago, a change to the
> original (en) source from PCRE had a huge diff deleting all the "available
> since PHP4.X.Y". Same inside other sour
I'm just putting back the subject here ;-)
Actually translating French doc, I noticed that few days ago, a change to
the original (en) source from PCRE had a huge diff deleting all the
"available since PHP4.X.Y". Same inside other sources from En doc.
So, what to do ?
I'm +1 to put away all the
Hi Hannes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:25:53PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> If we can create a standardized changelog for all features, I think
> that would solve everything.
Yes. Excellent.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>> Another great example that shows how difficult it can be to read
>> documentation that's littered with version history. The CLI docs border on
>> being unreadable.
>>
>> We don't have a nice way to list changelog history yet (for non-funct
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 17:12, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 07:09, Daniel Convissor
>>> Personally, I like the history being there. It is interesting to see how
>>> things evolve. Having this data there does no harm to
On Jan 24, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 07:09, Daniel Convissor
> wrote:
>> Hi Folks:
>>
>>> we'd no longer have phrases like:
>>>
>>> - As of PHP 5
>> ...
>>
>> There was a discussion about this a month or so ago. (I can't find it
>> now.)
>
> It was
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 07:09, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Hi Folks:
>
>> we'd no longer have phrases like:
>>
>> - As of PHP 5
> ...
>
> There was a discussion about this a month or so ago. (I can't find it
> now.)
It was about the OOP4 docs (which got moved to an appendix).
> Personally, I li
Hi Folks:
> we'd no longer have phrases like:
>
> - As of PHP 5
...
There was a discussion about this a month or so ago. (I can't find it
now.)
Personally, I like the history being there. It is interesting to see how
things evolve. Having this data there does no harm to anyone.
Let alone
On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 19:34, Philip Olson wrote:
>>
> [..]
>> Summary: Only changing the writing style would be simplest, and would still
>> increase readability of the PHP manual.
>
> What about changelog entries?
> Should those still
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 19:34, Philip Olson wrote:
>
[..]
> Summary: Only changing the writing style would be simplest, and would still
> increase readability of the PHP manual.
What about changelog entries?
Should those still say "parameter abc became available in PHP5.0.0"
for functions that h
On Jan 23, 2010, at 5:46 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 08:25, Philip Olson wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> What do people think about making PHP 5 a first class citizen? If done, we'd
>> no longer have phrases like:
>>
>> - As of PHP 5
>> - Since PHP 5
>> - Added in
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 08:25, Philip Olson wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> What do people think about making PHP 5 a first class citizen? If done, we'd
> no longer have phrases like:
>
> - As of PHP 5
> - Since PHP 5
> - Added in PHP 5
What about extensions, features and language things?
http:
On Jan 23, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Karoly Negyesi wrote:
>> And because nobody really uses 5.0.x, we could easily make 5.1.0 the base.
>> And we could tag the current manual and have it available somewhere, in case
>> some pour soul really wants it. What do people think?
>
> http://gophp5.org/ 5.2.
> And because nobody really uses 5.0.x, we could easily make 5.1.0 the base.
> And we could tag the current manual and have it available somewhere, in case
> some pour soul really wants it. What do people think?
http://gophp5.org/ 5.2.0 I would hope.
Regards
NK
21 matches
Mail list logo