Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Great, I am on it. If you feel that I should give precedence to a
particular group of functions please let me know.
Personally I think domxml and xmlrpc are the ones that need some
work as
one of PHP 5's spearpoints will be XML.
And also simplexml and Tidy.
Since these l
Great, I am on it. If you feel that I should give precedence to a
particular group of functions please let me know.
Personally I think domxml and xmlrpc are the ones that need some work as
one of PHP 5's spearpoints will be XML.
And also simplexml and Tidy.
Since these last two are already taken (a
Great, I am on it. If you feel that I should give precedence to a
particular group of functions please let me know.
Personally I think domxml and xmlrpc are the ones that need some work as
one of PHP 5's spearpoints will be XML.
Yep. Also most of the XML files with the undocumented entity placed in
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, David Costa wrote:
>
> > Great, I am on it. If you feel that I should give precedence to a
> > particular group of functions please let me know.
>
> Personally I think domxml and xmlrpc are the ones that need some work as
> one of PHP 5's spearpoints will be XML.
>
> Deric
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, David Costa wrote:
> Great, I am on it. If you feel that I should give precedence to a
> particular group of functions please let me know.
Personally I think domxml and xmlrpc are the ones that need some work as
one of PHP 5's spearpoints will be XML.
Derick
On 29 janv. 04, at 14:29, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, David Costa wrote:
Many of the functions in your file do not appear on the Zend
nodoku.php
file, is it normal or .. ?
That file is outdated then :) I did a grep for all 'documented
functions' with the entitie "undocumented.func"
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, David Costa wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Not to discourage your or something, but there are much better
> > candidates for documentation :) (See attached list)
>
> Hello Derick!
> Thanks for your feedback. I picked ircg_ from th
On Jan 29, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Not to discourage your or something, but there are much better
candidates for documentation :) (See attached list)
Hello Derick!
Thanks for your feedback. I picked ircg_ from the nodoku.php link
(previously provided by didou).
Many of the fun
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, David Costa wrote:
> Hello Mehdi and All,
> As suggested I started off with "documenting some undocumented
> functions"
Not to discourage your or something, but there are much better
candidates for documentation :) (See attached list)
regards,
Derickreference/com/functions/c
