asier to jump back and forth in the
content.
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Olson [mailto:phi...@roshambo.org]
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 9:44 AM
> To: Hannes Magnusson
> Cc: Ruslan Yakushev; PHP Documentation ML
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Re: Question abou
Hi Philip and Ruslan,
> Also, if you feel a screencast [video] would work, I'm sure we could
> find a way to accommodate.
PhD is not yet able to embed videos, but prepared for it through
its mediamanager. If we get a use case now, implementing the rest
isn't hard.
--
Regards/Mit freundlichen
Hello Ruslan,
Also, if you feel a screencast [video] would work, I'm sure we could
find a way to accommodate.
Regards,
Philip
This question has no place on this list, please take it
elsewhere and do not CC phpdoc.
Regards,
Philip
Yes, I *meant* (gr) to post it to both places...
Yes, I would like to see an alias too, it would be a lot easier...
--Andrew
On Saturday 20 April 2002 01:52 pm, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> > OK, I know there has been talk of changing the license, but has that
>
> really
>
> > gone anywhere?
>
> W
> OK, I know there has been talk of changing the license, but has that
really
> gone anywhere?
Well, we decided to contact all current authors, and ask them if they
accept our desicion. See the full license part in the protocol file in
the RFC dir of phpdoc.
> Yes, I just couldn't think of wheth
OK, I know there has been talk of changing the license, but has that really
gone anywhere?
Yes, I just couldn't think of whether the address had a hyphen or not (i
think some other php mailing lists have a hyphen), so I sent it to both
places to be safe.
--Andrew
On Saturday 20 April 2002 01
> Aren't the docs released under the GPL? If they are, then this would be
> allowed as long as the source was available (the xml code, i assume). Is
> this correct?
The *current* licence is GPL. BTW there is no [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but I guess you already noticed this...
Goba
Aren't the docs released under the GPL? If they are, then this would be
allowed as long as the source was available (the xml code, i assume). Is
this correct?
--Andrew
On Saturday 20 April 2002 08:09 am, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> Forwarding this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where the document
> wri
