On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Etienne Kneuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've experienced some crashes with runkit, caused by strange code that
> should have never worked. Apparently, its test coverage is not that
> high. Additionally it has 39 opened bugs, some of which are quite old.
> So
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(Shooting to docs and PECL-dev.)
>
>While doing an overhaul of the user notes, I noticed that many of
> the runkit functions are still marked as "experimental" in the
> documentation. Version 0.7 introduced s
