Sounds good, let's do it! I'm guessing this project will require a
CVS module and perhaps it can be named phpdoc-web
As far as I have seen 'php' is not included in the CVS module and
mailing list names, just when particularly needed ('php-src').
What about php-news-web, php-master-web, phpweb Gabo
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Mehdi Achour wrote:
> Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
> >> Sounds good, let's do it! I'm guessing this project will require a
> >> CVS module and perhaps it can be named phpdoc-web
> >
> >
> > As far as I have seen 'php' is not included in the CVS module and
> > mailing list names, just
Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Sounds good, let's do it! I'm guessing this project will require a
CVS module and perhaps it can be named phpdoc-web
As far as I have seen 'php' is not included in the CVS module and
mailing list names, just when particularly needed ('php-src').
What about php-news-web,
Sounds great! +1! b3 1337! Yeah!
&what.derek.said;
Maybe also we can write in a way to lock extensions -- that is, "Joe Cool
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is working on /ext/perl docs offline."
Ken Tossell
Sounds good, let's do it! I'm guessing this project will require
a CVS module and perhaps it can be named phpdoc-web
As far as I have seen 'php' is not included in the CVS module and
mailing list names, just when particularly needed ('php-src').
Goba
Ill +1 this as well, imho the doc team is without real collaboration
And yes test bed for lives docs would be good, and up and till know I didn't
know of the existence of docs.php.net and a big +1 on our own bug list :)
Shove un documented functions in there and we can assign them to our selves
so
> >> I was thinking about opening a site dedicated to the phpdoc team.
> >> This site would have the following goals:
> >>
> >> - centralize the efforts of the various contributors.
> >> - provide reference documents:
> >> * list of the undocumented functions
> >> * large TODO
> >> * list of
I'm really +1 for this.
Making the notes more bigger part of the docs always has been a dream :)
Doc suggestions won't be lost when deleting a note about it..
- Vincent
On Friday 30 January 2004 14:20, Mehdi Achour wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking about opening a site dedicated to the phpdoc
Derek Ford wrote:
+1, I love the idea.
If you need any help on the development of the website, or with
writing, let me know, I'm readily available.
Heh thanks, but we're not yet at this stage :) As everybody (still
waiting for a lot of others phpdoc'ers to talk) seems to agree with this
idea
+1, I love the idea.
If you need any help on the development of the website, or with writing,
let me know, I'm readily available.
Derek
Mehdi Achour wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking about opening a site dedicated to the phpdoc team.
This site would have the following goals:
- centralize the effo
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Mehdi wrote:
> To reflect the new feature we are slowly introducing, including the
> php.net theme, etc ? :)
But it's so clean now :) (And the box isdead slow anyway)
> >>Nothing to say about my proposal btw ?
> >
> >Which? :)
> >
> Read the subject of this thread, and the o
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Mehdi Achour wrote:
Ages ago, as a testbed for livedocs
and it stays, atleast for now.
What about updating it if "and it stays" ?
I'll update it it when I have some time, at the moment it works fine, so
why update?
To reflect the new fe
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Mehdi Achour wrote:
> > Ages ago, as a testbed for livedocs
> > and it stays, atleast for now.
>
> What about updating it if "and it stays" ?
I'll update it it when I have some time, at the moment it works fine, so
why update?
> Nothing to say about my proposal btw ?
Which?
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Mehdi wrote:
Nuno Lopes wrote:
+1 on this.
It would be great to have one place with all the information (undocumented
functions including those with the &warn.undocumented.func entity) and the
functions missing examples, etc...
If we can get the doc.ph
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Mehdi wrote:
> Nuno Lopes wrote:
>
> >+1 on this.
> >It would be great to have one place with all the information (undocumented
> >functions including those with the &warn.undocumented.func entity) and the
> >functions missing examples, etc...
> >
> >If we can get the doc.php.
>
> Oh, I didn't know about docs.php.net :| when was it created ?
>
> didou
>
I don't know either, but It was already on-line last year.
Nuno Lopes wrote:
+1 on this.
It would be great to have one place with all the information (undocumented
functions including those with the &warn.undocumented.func entity) and the
functions missing examples, etc...
If we can get the doc.php.net, the docs.php.net wouldn't be needed anymore,
as long
+1 on this.
It would be great to have one place with all the information (undocumented
functions including those with the &warn.undocumented.func entity) and the
functions missing examples, etc...
If we can get the doc.php.net, the docs.php.net wouldn't be needed anymore,
as long as we put the liv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
I think this is a great idea.
Depending on traffic, and requirements, (and a non-favorable answer from
systems@), I might be able to host it.
S
Mehdi Achour wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I was thinking about opening a site dedicated to the phpdoc team.
| Thi
On Jan 30, 2004, at 2:20 PM, Mehdi Achour wrote:
Hi all,
I was thinking about opening a site dedicated to the phpdoc team.
This site would have the following goals:
- centralize the efforts of the various contributors.
- provide reference documents:
* list of the undocumented functions
* larg
20 matches
Mail list logo
