It still makes sense the way I said it, I think.
I'll reword it, though.
- Original Message -
From: "Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aidan Lister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 6:3
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Aidan Lister wrote:
> - Since all GIF support was removed from the GD library in
> - version 1.6, this function is not available if you are using
> - that version of the GD library.
> + GIF support was removed from the GD library in Version 1.6,
> +
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 00:58, Ken Tossell wrote:
> kennytMon Apr 12 18:58:32 2004 EDT
>
> Modified files:
> /phpdoc/en/reference/image/functions imageantialias.xml
> imagecolormatch.xml
>
>> pollita Sat Jan 25 20:34:13 2003 EDT
>>
>> Added files:
>> /phpdoc/en/reference/image/functions imagecolorallocatealpha.xml
>> Log:
>> New function.
>
> Wouldn't it be more logical to add an optional parameter to
> imagecolorallocate instead of adding a new function? W
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Erica Douglass wrote:
> But this is on the getimagesize() page. Isn't a link redundant? Should I
> use instead?
Nope, it's a function name, and not a method name. DocBook XML isn't
about layout, it's about content.
Derick
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Derick Re
But this is on the getimagesize() page. Isn't a link redundant? Should I
use instead?
Erica
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/image/f
