On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Sara Golemon wrote:
> I notice that the current manual pages for the filesystem function refer
> to file pointer resources as ints. Am I the only one who thinks this
> could be confusing to end-users? Wouldn't "resource" be a better type to
> present? or "stream"?
We didn't
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Sara Golemon wrote:
> I notice that the current manual pages for the filesystem function refer
> to file pointer resources as ints. Am I the only one who thinks this
> could be confusing to end-users? Wouldn't "resource" be a better type to
> present? or "stream"?
Some func
