> I can't remember...;-)
>
> I have the time to move/integrate features/error-handling to
> reference/errorfunc. I took a look at RFC/manual.xml.in:
>
> &Features;
> &features.error-handling;
>
>
>
> Here it is still under features.
> Is it ok to integrate the features/error-handli
[...]
>> >> Where should error and logging config options go to, to errorfunc?
>>
>> > Features / error handling ?
>>
>> Ok, this would imply to link them from refernce/errorfunc.
> Doh, reverting my last suggection, put them to reference/errorfunc.
Done :-)
> As discussed before, if we go
> sure, maybe my question was not exactly enough:-)
> The related functions to the above mentioned settings could
> be found under refernece/misc. Therefore the question.
> Should these ini-seetings be placed under reference/misc?
So then put them to reference/misc.
> >> Where should error and l
Hallo Gabor,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 7:22:07 PM, you wrote:
>> personally I would like to finish the integration of the ini-settings
>> (as far as I can do and to my knowledge) about the weekend.
>> I would like to get your opinions about where to move/document the
>> following settings:
>>
> personally I would like to finish the integration of the ini-settings
> (as far as I can do and to my knowledge) about the weekend.
> I would like to get your opinions about where to move/document the
> following settings:
>
> Miscellaneous functions
> - highlight.string etc.
> - ignore_user_ab
