SC> My instant livedocs, for example, has not evolved, primarily because:
SC> lack of expressed interest from anyone but me and Goba, I haven't
SC> received much feedback, I got hung up on a bug
SC> (http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=33608), and:
I've seen livedocs, but didn't understand how it work
||*()*|| Hi, Sean.
>> GH> Project map about what projects?
>>
>> Project: PHPDOC
>> Subprojects: PHPDOC TOOLS, LIVEDOCS, DOCWEB, USERNOTES
>>
>> Project: PEAR
>> Subprojects: PEARDOC, PEARDOC TOOLS, PEARWEB, PEAR AUTOMATION
>>
>> Project: PHP.NET
>> Subprojects: DEV-MASTER-WEB, DEV-BUGTRACK, SY
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> ||*()*|| Hi, Derick.
>
> >> My opinion that PHP.NET need a public-available project map, where
> >> project description, technology, roadmap, status and general guidelines
> >> will be explained, but I'm afraid that without commercial support it
> >
||*()*|| Hi, Gabor.
>> GH> Isn't it time to post a news announcement about Sean's instant livedocs
>> GH> on php.net, so that we get actual testers finally? It seems that Sean
>> GH> have not received too many comments on his work, but it would allow us
>> GH> to get the word out finally. I know t
||*()*|| Hi, Derick.
>> My opinion that PHP.NET need a public-available project map, where
>> project description, technology, roadmap, status and general guidelines
>> will be explained, but I'm afraid that without commercial support it
>> is not real to get started.
DR> Why?
1. Developers are