Hi Folks:
I was looking through the manual for info on upgrading to 5.2 and found
nothing. With some good Googling I found
http://www.php.net/UPDATE_5_2.txt.
Of course, it's best to have stuff in the manual, so I took the text from
UPDATE_5_2.txt and formatted it like en/appendices/migrating5
Hi Hannes:
> You didn't read the release announcement, did you? :)
I did, guess I'm dense.
> >Question: What are the rules with how the link's are added. Will the
> >system automatically figure everything out? Even things like this?
> > XMLReader::open
>
> That depends on the ID of the fu
Greetings:
Pardon me for being brief and not providing diffs (I've had a long day and
I've been spending a LOT of time working on the PEAR docs and website).
But, here are some quick pointers to some ideas to make Windows intsalls
easier.
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=24970
http://lists.nyph
Hi Gabor:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 10:13:30AM +0200, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. It sounds good, but the problem is that if we
> write: 'change your PATH value', then a lot of people will not know what
> we are speaking about. The method differs by system to system. We nee
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 03:40:03PM +0200, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> OK, what if someone has files left from a previous PHP installation? I
> guess if one inserts the PHP folders onto the start of the PATH, then
> this is not a problem
It would still be best to go through and remove them. A pain
Hi Folks:
I'm glad to see PHP 5.3 is allowing the use of variables to access
classes in a static context and documentation to that effect. (Thank
you Etienne, at least for the docs, if not the C code too.) Here's
what's in the docs at the moment:
As of PHP 5.3.0, it's possible to referenc
Hi Etienne:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:59:43PM +0100, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
>
> Looks fine to me, please go ahead and commit this.
> As you may have seen, I documented this feature in multiple files, so
> be sure to change them all.
Hmmm... Seems my karma's been revoked. I've uploaded a patch
Hi Folks:
I'm curious when the manual is built and where the logs are for the build
process (if they exist)? I looked around the documentation, archives and
Googled for this info to no avail.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
d
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 08:44:20AM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> There are no public log files.
That's unfortunate.
> Currently docs.php.net does a complete rebuild (phpweb, html and
> bightml) every 6 hours for all languages (although only 3 or 4
> translations work).
I had a feeling som
Hi Hannes:
> The idea is to first refactor it with minimum changes so translators
> don't have to retranslate the entire thing again.
> Then after the commit it is easy to make any further adjustments, but
> yeah. That should be noted.
Yeah. Was thinking the same thing.
Thanks for the the fixes
Hannes is on a roll!
Can I suggest changing "Get" to "Gets" in the refpurpose's?
Is it possible to explain the purpose of ErrorException's? For example:
function exceptions_error_handler($severity, $message, $filename,
$lineno) {
throw new ErrorException($message, 0, $severity
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:59:16AM +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Many are
> using the php manual notes as a SEO technique. The PHP website (and the
> mirrors) have a high PageRank
Oh, guess I should add some notes... :)
Well, we could add rel="nofollow" to the links in the notes.
--Dan
--
T
Hi Folks:
The various http://php.net/mysqli_* function names redirects go to the
old mysql_* functions rather than the "new" myslqi_* functions. Is this
intentional?
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and databa
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:46:29PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 15:04, Daniel Convissor
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Folks:
> >
> > The various http://php.net/mysqli_* function names redirects go to the
> > old mysql_* fun
Hi Folks:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:04:48PM -0400, Daniel Brown wrote:
> While looking through parts of the website, I also audited the
> user note submission form and found a hole that allows wide-spread
> SPAM.
While that's a problem, _I_ wouldn't call that a security problem.
I tend to
Hi Guys:
> http://pb11.php.net/sitemap.php
Overall, looks good. Thanks. Two minor suggestions, please.
There's a lot of white space in the area between the top of the page and
the header at the top of the main content section. Hmm, minor nit,
that really should be an but styled to be the
Hi Hannes:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 08:40:24AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> The is rendered from the DocBook markup. In context then this is
> the second heading of that section, which is why its rendered as
Ah. Thanks.
> The font size is nowhere hardcoded. It uses em and %.
That's ha
Hi Ross:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:57:55AM +0100, Ross Masters wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 05:04 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
>>> The font size is nowhere hardcoded. It uses em and %.
>>
>> That's hard coding. We shouldn't be setting it at all.
Hi Ross:
> Sorry if I came across rudely there, that wasn't my intention.
No, didn't take it that way at all. Similarly, sorry if I came across
harshly.
> As far as I see it the best practice is to not set a font-size for the
> body tag and to allow to use whatever it wants. Then apply
> p
Hi Hannes:
> I had a very hard time understanding what you meant with "hard coding"
> as it definitely wasn't *hardcoded*. Using % and ems is the way to go
> exactly for this reason; give the user the choice of resizing.
Yup. Email conversations are rife with misunderstandings. :)
> >> If we d
Hi Hannes:
> How does http://pb11.php.net/design/styles.html look to you?
http://www.analysisandsolutions.com/php/web.feedback.styles.1.png
I'm using Firefox 3.0.1.
Oh, one thing that may have been throwing you off before about the size
of the headers is I had the "minimum font size" set. I t
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:40:34PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I think the "Wont fix" was due to the fact you can do $foo[] =
> "value"; without initializing $foo = array() without getting any
> notices or difference then initializing it beforehand.
>
> Although we shouldn't be advocating
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:01:38AM +, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> Is there a way to create a template for commits?
>
> [ ] Typo/WS
> [ ] Minor change
> [ ] Major change/rewrite
> [ ] Example added
> Bug #
> Comments::
I like this idea. There's no way I know of to have a template that SVN
p
Hi Sebastian:
> like you can read in the subject - i would like to start in the Doc section
> (English -> German).
Welcome!
> Is there anyone who can give me information and tipps fort he first stepps.
http://www.php.net/
Click the "Documentation" link at the top.
Notice that there's a bulle
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:57:46PM +0800, Gang Chen wrote:
>
> $header = << "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
Has there been discussion of making this, and all (relevant) PhD output,
XHTML compliant? I can go through the code and make it so (or at least
closer).
>
>
> $t
Hi Hannes:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:10:28PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> PhD does try to be as xhtml compliant as it can. There are several
> cases which we simply cannot fix, but others that simply have been an
> oversight.
Ja. Cool.
> It is a tough problem. Be anal about validation
Hi Simion:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Simion Onea wrote:
>
> --- constants.xml 19 Dec 2008 07:52:28 - 1.5
...
> - The following constants indicates an error type returned
> - by json_last_error and are all available
> - as of PHP 5.3.0.
> + The following constant
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 04:34:04PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> http://wiki.php.net/doc/articles/nomenclature ?
Yes! Thanks. I just added it to the README file so I and others can
find it in the future.
I also just tried to commit similar changes to
http://doc.php.net/php/dochowto/chapt
Hi Philip:
> The HOWTO lives in phpdoc/howto/ ...
Interesting. Then what's in http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/docstuff/ ?
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.Ana
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 09:01:24PM +0200, Simion Onea wrote:
>
> No problem at all, Kalle. I committed the changes myself earlier.
Please correct the "as of"/"since" per
http://wiki.php.net/doc/articles/nomenclature.
Also please wrap the text around 70 cols (that's around where we suggest
doing
Hi Michael:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:54:47AM +, Michael Maclean wrote:
> I've been working on updating the docs for ext/soap to the new markup
Thanks.
> It's pretty much a port of the existing documentation though with
> phrases like "you will need..." changed for the 3rd person, etc. If
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 09:09:03AM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
> The only maintained method for validating XML is configure.php
Ah, so I'll update the doc team docs to remove references to
xml-check.php.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 07:12:10PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I'd like to start a "how to help"/"contributing" set of books covering
> how to particpate in the various php projects (pecl, qa, phpdoc,
> src...).
...
> move phpdoc/howto into phpdoc/en/contribute/phpdoc
That sounds like a ve
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> - http://www.djangobook.com/en/2.0/chapter01/
Sounds neat. BUT, it seems they've gotten too big for their britches.
It isn't working for me. I don't see any comment bubbles or have the
ability to click in the "gutter" to init
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:26:46AM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2009, at 07:41, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
>> Even if it was working, the whole thing requires JavaScript, limiting
>> availability of the comments in some situations.
>
> I don't buy this argume
Folks:
It would be neat if people on the doc team could subscribe to a page so
the person could be notified when new comments are made. This will be
helpful for someone who has edited the page and/or culled the existing
user notes so the person can edit/curate comments as they come in.
--Dan
Welcome Manuel:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 02:24:52AM -0500, Manuel Aude wrote:
>
> I was hoping I could get some simple guidelines to get started into it.
http://wiki.php.net/doc has much of what you'll need.
The "how to" at http://doc.php.net/php/dochowto/ is a bit outdated. A
new "how to" is
Hi Kristina:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:46:34AM -0400, Kristina Chodorow wrote:
>
> cvs [server aborted]: "commit" requires write access to the repository
I bet you initially checked out the sources using the public, read-only,
credentials. That authentication information is then used when you
Hi Eddie:
> 3) "Why use Reflection?" - an analysis of realistic cases where
> Reflection is useful, perhaps linking ot external resources for
> further research (wikipedia, probably)
>
> And basically, I've not seen (not that it doesn't exist), an example
> of #3 in use in the PHP manual any wher
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 02:48:51AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> Note: As these modules use svn:externals you _cannot_ commit to more
> then one module at a time.
Are you sure? I was working on a project where we had an external
reference. You were able to commit to the main repository an
Hi Folks
Someone looking through the manual for ways to handle dates or times,
will be befutled to find that the Table of Contents page,
http://us2.php.net/manual/en/, has no mention of the word "date" or
"time."
I'm assuming that's because the relatively new DateTime class was put
under the
Hey Gwynne and the Doc Team:
I just went to look at the annotated view of a file in SVN and found it
can't to do so, saying "Unable to calculate annotation data on binary
file contents."
Binary? Huh? These are all text files. Is this because of the
conversion from CVS? Is a property misset
Hola Gwynne:
> Looks like ViewVC thinks the file is binary as long as svn:mime-type is
> set, even though it's set to text/plain. Try propdel-ing the
> svn:mime-type entirely.
Doesn't seem to make a difference.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
Hi Lars:
> In an earlier draft I had words to this effect, but it just got to be
> unwieldy, since it felt like if I explained that some people call class
> variables "properties", I should explain that others call them "members"
> or "member variables" or "attributes" or what-have-you. I'll
Hi Brandon:
Nice stuff. Two qualms with the following:
PHP 5's object model also significantly changes the way objects
are passed, passing a pointer to the object rather than copying
the object.
First, "passed" is the followed immediately by "passing." Pick a
different word for o
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:56:43PM -0700, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>
> Personally I like "property"
I agree. That's what I, and most people, call them. It'd be good to
have that be the term throughout the manual.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M
Hi Brandon:
> http://blog.libssh2.org/index.php?/archives/51-Youre-being-lied-to..html
Yeah, that's a good article. I've seen it on other occasions. But she's
kind of "lying" too...
m = $b->m\n";
// Copy-on-write is not what happens when dealing only with objects:
class not_copy_on_write {
Hi Greg:
> Copy-on-write still happens, the example you gave doesn't change a
> variable, only a property.
Yeah.
> A better comparison would be between arrays and objects, as this
> demonstrates that they behave differently in PHP 5, but were the same in
> PHP 4
>
> $a = array('m' => 'foo');
Hi Hannes:
> Like with the PHP4 OO docs, they should either be removed or at most
> refactored into an appendix.
Yeah, the appendix is a good place for that.
> Even
> the functions versioninfo, there is no reason to mention PHP4 anymore.
I disagree. It can be helpful to know when a function w
Hi:
You want to subscribe to PHP's "General user list." See
http://us2.php.net/mailing-lists.php for more information.
Good luck,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.A
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:17:01PM -0400, Moacir de Oliveira wrote:
> Fala Thiago,
>
> 2009/10/27 Thiago H. Pojda
>
> > $ phd -d doc-base/.manual.xml --package PHP
...
> > fopen(/usr/local/lib/php//HaruDoc.php): failed to open stream: No such
> > file or directory
I just committed a change
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:18:33PM +, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> Also, I'm not entirely sure anymore if rendering all the supported
> formats (when none are specified) is A Good Thing.
> Maybe we shouldn't default on any format and make the user explicitly
> mention which formats to render.
Ve
Hi Christian:
> > > > fopen(/usr/local/lib/php//HaruDoc.php): failed to open
> > > > stream: No such file or directory
> > I just committed a change to avoid the warning by using is_readable()
> > instead of fopen() here.
> I reverted your commit, because it broke everything.
Ouch. What bro
Hi crhsitian:
> Try installing it and running the pear-installed phd. Then you need the
> include path.
Doh! Thanks for catching that. I added a comment explaining why fopen()
is used. And a @ to suppress potential warnings.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C
Hi Hannes:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 05:46:45PM +, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> 2009/10/30 Daniel Convissor :
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:17:01PM -0400, Moacir de Oliveira wrote:
> >>
> >> > PHP Fatal error: ?Uncaught exception 'Exception' with mess
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 04:20:52PM -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
> I just cant find any decent way to do this. Using that flag just causes
> xmllint to build then doc and then do a validation against the DTD.
Hmm... Is it possible to determine the various DTD files required, cat
them together in
Hi Folks:
> we'd no longer have phrases like:
>
> - As of PHP 5
...
There was a discussion about this a month or so ago. (I can't find it
now.)
Personally, I like the history being there. It is interesting to see how
things evolve. Having this data there does no harm to anyone.
Let alone
Hi Hannes:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:25:53PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> If we can create a standardized changelog for all features, I think
> that would solve everything.
Yes. Excellent.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 04:28:21PM +0100, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> Just install the root cert from http://www.cacert.org
Someone I trust regarding security issues said the following recently
about doing such:
I note that as of 2009-01-05 evidently CAcert began requiring not just
"can you get
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 06:13:14PM -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> Our certs are fine and
> can be trusted and provides the encryption we need. If you don't want
> to trust other cacert-based ones don't install the root and just tell
> your browser to accept the php.net ones permanently.
Which
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:23:27PM +0800, KSChan wrote:
>
> Shall we still bet on WYSIWYG editor? I didn't spend much time on this
> feature :P
I fear such will lead to the XML becoming an enormous mess of misused and
inappropriate elements.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U
Hi:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:17:25PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> centos/RHEL, PHP 5.3-related packages are extremely easy to come by.
> it may be that you have to look for the generally-approved repos (in
> this case, http://rpms.famillecollet.com/enterprise/5/, among others),
> but they
Hi Philip:
> - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/StyleGuide
Wow. That's an excellent read. Thanks. Though the a/an URL section
needs cleaning up, so I emailed them about it.
> - http://oreilly.com/oreilly/author/stylesheet.html
While I don't like the way this one is written, it d
Hi Pedram:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:23:50PM +0430, pedram salehpoor wrote:
>
> Regarding using tags, I'd like the way books put some special notes on the
> side of page. So I think if we use following tags it would be good:
Interesting. But what do we do with the 23,377 existing notes?
> Re
Hi Yannick:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 06:46:13PM +0200, yannick wrote:
> *Completely useless, therefore, essential ! Include a chat into the
> editor*
-10.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
Hi Folks:
I'm using the online doc editor for the first time. Very impressive!
I ran into a couple issues with colors.
In the commit dialog, the log message entry field has a white background,
but the foreground/text color was not set. My browser preferences use
white text. So the commit me
Hi Folks:
I'm looking at the skeletons at
http://doc.php.net/php/dochowto/chapter-skeletons.php and am seeing some
elements are being wrapped in 's even though they don't need to be:
* variablelist in the parameters section
* informaltable in the changelog section
* example in the examples sect
Hi Folks:
The files in phpdoc/doc-base/trunk/RFC/skeletons use the old
documentation structure. Should these files be updated, or should the be
eliminated?
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database progr
Hi Folks:
I just set up a mirror of the PHP website on my Linux box for
documentation testing purposes. The website has the manual output in
"/manual/en". But PhD puts the output in
"/php-web".
This happens because Package/PHP/Web.php defines the format name as
"PHP-Web" and then uses that
Hi Philip:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:05:03PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> Typically people use a symlink, see:
> http://wiki.php.net/doc/phd/view
Oy. Yet another documentation how to page. :) I was looking at similar,
but slightly different instructions on
http://doc.php.net/php/dochowt
Hi Philip:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:20:48PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> > The files in phpdoc/doc-base/trunk/RFC/skeletons use the old
> > documentation structure. Should these files be updated, or should t
Hi Folks:
In trying to add the procedural style interface to the DateTime docs I
went searching for how we currently present stuff that has both object
oriented and procedural interfaces. It turns out there is no consistent
way of going about it, plus there are some other oddities that would b
Hi Peter:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:00:50AM +0100, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>
> I don't think having a new example block just for output makes much
> semantic sense. How about having multiple elements
> (one per paradigm) and one with the &examples.outputs*
> entities?
I just tested it and it wor
Hello Again:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:38:29AM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> * variablelist in the parameters section
> * informaltable in the changelog section
> * example in the examples section
> * simplelist in the seealso section
>
> The Element Reference in &qu
Welcome Jesus:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Jess Cova wrote:
> Hi good afternoon i wonder how can i commit a document i do not know.. i
> have a SVN account but i'm new
In short, do a "svn checkout" of the source code. Then make your
changes, do an "svn diff" to make sure the chang
Heya:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:50:50PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 20:57, Daniel Convissor
> wrote:
> > Welcome Jesus:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:01:01PM +0200, Jess Cova wrote:
> >> Hi good afternoon i wonder how can i co
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:53:11PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I have no idea why those s are there, and they do annoy me too :]
How about I make the changes I suggsted to all the files in the
datetime/datetime directory. Then folks can take a look and see what
they think about the resu
Hi Richard:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:45:07AM +0100, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> Just looking through some of the DateTime examples and noticed that
> they are using as a line terminator.
I agree, CLI output is preferable.
Several of the DateTime examples are overblown in general. The one
D
Hi Hannes:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:31:28PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 14:15, Daniel Convissor
> >
> > Several of the DateTime examples are overblown in general. ?The one
> > DateTime::add() has six sample statements in it. ?For such a
>
Hi Hannes:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:27:52PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> My only concern is massive WS changes.. But there isn't really any way
> around that :]
> Please make sure the commit message is clear enough so translator know
> exactly what has changed and don't have to review eve
Hi Hannes:
Thanks for your thorough consideration. Here are some more thoughts...
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 05:42:14PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> Wouldn't &style.oop.[[static.]method|ctor|dtor|property]; make more
> sense? Just to make it really clear what it is.
If there were cases whe
Hi Hannes:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:46:47AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 21:17, Daniel Convissor
> wrote:
> > If you're talking about the same , I agree. ?If you are talking
> > about the same , I disagree because it will lengthen and
Hi Hannes:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 08:46:21PM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:53:11PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> >
> > I have no idea why those s are there, and they do annoy me too :]
>
> Hannes, to pull this off, can you please grant m
Hi Hannes:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 03:44:32PM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 15:39, Daniel Convissor
> wrote:
>
> > What seems clearest to me is to have Example #1 be drop dead simple use
> > case and be composed of an OOP programlisting, a procedur
Hi Hannes:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:08:44AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I think a new entity saying "Both examples above will output" is needed..
> Looks great though.
It already exists and is what I used in that example.
> Is the html already generated by PhD like this?
No.
> And
Hi Hannes:
> Bug report it, I'll see if I can change it this weekend.
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=51667
Thanks so much,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisA
Hola:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> Derick gave you web/php karma just now..
I committed the example spacing changes.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database prog
Hi Hannes:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> I didn't even realize that built-in classes had private
> properties/methods. Seems utterly useless to tell the end-user that.
You're right. They shouldn't be in the docs in the first place, even in
their original
Hi Derick:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:50:36PM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 4 May 2010, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> > Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=298971
> >
> > Log:
> > Procedural methods operate on object by referen
Hi Derick:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:12:25PM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> There is still a difference in userland between:
>
> function tralala ( $foo );
>
> and
>
> function tralala ( &$foo );
>
> with $foo being fed an object. Objects are passed by a handle, so it
> looks like a refer
Hi Peter:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:02:57AM +0100, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 5 May 2010 01:51, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> > danielc ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Wed, 05 May 2010 00:51:18 +
> >
> > Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=29
Hi Folks:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:31:15AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> None of our docs mention this (see intl and mysqli for example).
>
> It is clearly expected behavior and is documented in the oo chapters.
Just because a function takes an object as a parameter does not mean the
fu
Hi Derick:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:47:32AM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> > Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=299008
> >
> > Log:
> > Add example of how adding months can be problematic
Hi Derick:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:45:32AM +0100, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Daniel Convissor wrote:
>
> > Modified: phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/datetime/datetime/construct.xml
> > ===
>
Hi Folks:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:40:17AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be better to have just quick'n'dirty examples on these
> pages and then create a "best practice" or "advanced examples"
> chapter?
I was wondering this. My thought was it seemed clearer to have one
exam
Heya:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 01:49:25PM -0700, Philip Olson wrote:
>
> There's been talk of allowing expanded pages within the documentation.
> For example, this page:
> - http://php.net/manual/en/reference.pcre.pattern.syntax.php
Oh, wow! Hadn't seen the new layout.
Sorry to get off on a t
Folks:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:10:28PM -0400, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> STATIC
> --
> DocBook:
>
>foo
>
> public
> static
> int
> bar
>
>
... snip ...
> OBJECT
> --
> DocBook:
>
>foo
>
Hi Philip:
> Nobody knows if/when PHP 5.4 or PHP 6 will exist, yet commits are happening
> in php-src/ trunk. We need to figure out how to document this stuff in such a
> way that we:
...
> Here's a proposal that may work, please critique:
Looks good. Thanks for thinking about this stuff.
--D
Hi Richard:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:08:17PM +0100, Richard Quadling wrote:
>
> In the event that the xpointer evaluation doesn't return anything, the
> "XPointer evaluation failed" warning is always thrown and the
> xfallback kicks in.
If there's nothing for a query to find, why is the query
Hi Ulf:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:45:38PM +0200, Ulf Wendel wrote:
>
> I've drafted some initial documentation for PECL/mysqlnd_qc.
Excellent, thanks! I just took a very quick look and have some coding
standards feedback:
* Nesting is one space per level, you're generally using two, but some
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
