[phpsoa] Re: Methods Documentation in WSDL

2008-06-04 Thread Graham Charters

Hi Silvano,

There's a text document called CLA in the distirbution (see
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/sdo/CLA?revision=1.2view=markuppathrev=MAIN).
It describes what you need to do.  If you have any questions or
concerns, please let me know.

Regards, Graham.

On 2 Jun, 16:53, Silvano Girardi Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Graham,
 I have that interest. Where do I start? :)

 Thanks
 Silvano

 On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:



  Hi Silvano,

  Sorry for not replying sooner and not replying to your original note.
  I always had in mind to generate documentation in the WSDL from the
  methods descriptions, so what you have done is exactly the right idea.

  Thanks also for the patch.  I haven't taken a look at the moment.  The
  SCA_SDO project has a CLA to cover contributions and so far as I'm
  aware you've not signed, or been asked to sign it.  Is this something
  you'd be willing and able to do?  I can give you more information in
  needed.

  Regards, Graham.

  On 30 May, 17:05, Silvano Girardi Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Since I got no comments, I made it only for methods and not optional.

   I've put the patch in the case.

   Silvano

   On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Silvano Girardi Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   wrote:

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:

Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:

 Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:

 is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
 documentation/documentation in the WSDL based on the method's
 description in the doc block?
 Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any
volunteers?

 I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in
  my
spare
 time.

 I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are
  going
to
 do this.
 Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can
  put
 here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how
  you
guys
 handle these things).

 Anyway, I am a volunteer :)

 Silvano

Great :-)
Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at
   http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you
  have
a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it.

Ok I just did it:http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775

Need your thoughts here.

1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in
  the
request above), or only for methods?
2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle
this?

Silvano
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[phpsoa] Re: Methods Documentation in WSDL

2008-06-02 Thread Graham Charters

Hi Silvano,

Sorry for not replying sooner and not replying to your original note.
I always had in mind to generate documentation in the WSDL from the
methods descriptions, so what you have done is exactly the right idea.

Thanks also for the patch.  I haven't taken a look at the moment.  The
SCA_SDO project has a CLA to cover contributions and so far as I'm
aware you've not signed, or been asked to sign it.  Is this something
you'd be willing and able to do?  I can give you more information in
needed.

Regards, Graham.

On 30 May, 17:05, Silvano Girardi Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Since I got no comments, I made it only for methods and not optional.

 I've put the patch in the case.

 Silvano

 On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Silvano Girardi Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  wrote:

  Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
   On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   wrote:

   Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:

   is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
   documentation/documentation in the WSDL based on the method's
   description in the doc block?
   Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any
  volunteers?

   I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in my
  spare
   time.

   I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are going
  to
   do this.
   Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can put
   here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how you
  guys
   handle these things).

   Anyway, I am a volunteer :)

   Silvano

  Great :-)
  Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at
 http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you have
  a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it.

  Ok I just did it:http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775

  Need your thoughts here.

  1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in the
  request above), or only for methods?
  2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle
  this?

  Silvano
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[phpsoa] Re: Methods Documentation in WSDL

2008-06-02 Thread Silvano Girardi Jr
Hi Graham,
I have that interest. Where do I start? :)

Thanks
Silvano

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


 Hi Silvano,

 Sorry for not replying sooner and not replying to your original note.
 I always had in mind to generate documentation in the WSDL from the
 methods descriptions, so what you have done is exactly the right idea.

 Thanks also for the patch.  I haven't taken a look at the moment.  The
 SCA_SDO project has a CLA to cover contributions and so far as I'm
 aware you've not signed, or been asked to sign it.  Is this something
 you'd be willing and able to do?  I can give you more information in
 needed.

 Regards, Graham.

 On 30 May, 17:05, Silvano Girardi Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Since I got no comments, I made it only for methods and not optional.
 
  I've put the patch in the case.
 
  Silvano
 
  On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Silvano Girardi Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  wrote:
 
   On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
   Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
 
is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
documentation/documentation in the WSDL based on the method's
description in the doc block?
Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any
   volunteers?
 
I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in
 my
   spare
time.
 
I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are
 going
   to
do this.
Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can
 put
here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how
 you
   guys
handle these things).
 
Anyway, I am a volunteer :)
 
Silvano
 
   Great :-)
   Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at
  http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you
 have
   a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it.
 
   Ok I just did it:http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13775
 
   Need your thoughts here.
 
   1 - should it include the description of the service too (as I put in
 the
   request above), or only for methods?
   2 - should it always happen or be optional? If optional, how to handle
   this?
 
   Silvano
 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[phpsoa] Re: Methods Documentation in WSDL

2008-04-25 Thread Caroline Maynard

Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:

 is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
 documentation/documentation in the WSDL based on the method's
 description in the doc block?

Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any volunteers?


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[phpsoa] Re: Methods Documentation in WSDL

2008-04-25 Thread Silvano Girardi Jr
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:

  is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
  documentation/documentation in the WSDL based on the method's
  description in the doc block?

 Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any volunteers?


I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in my spare
time.

I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are going to
do this.
Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can put
here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how you guys
handle these things).

Anyway, I am a volunteer :)

Silvano

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[phpsoa] Re: Methods Documentation in WSDL

2008-04-25 Thread Caroline Maynard

Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Silvano Girardi Jr wrote:

 is there any special reason for the SCA to do not generate the
 documentation/documentation in the WSDL based on the method's
 description in the doc block?
 Probably nobody thought to do it. Seems a good idea to me. Any volunteers?

 
 I was checking how it works and it seems something I can handle in my spare
 time.
 
 I will need to be in touch with someone here to discuss how we are going to
 do this.
 Might be best in private and once we define the ways to do it we can put
 here in the list for votes. (Just thoughts really... not sure how you guys
 handle these things).
 
 Anyway, I am a volunteer :)
 
 Silvano
 
Great :-)
Suggest you raise a Feature/Change Request at 
http://pecl.php.net/bugs/report.php?package=SCA_SDO. Then when you have 
a proposed patch we can get the relevant committers to review it.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---