I totally agree with Pornel's point of view (point 4 and his website). Why switch to namespaces? Apart from that using them is really problematic every modern autoloader allows us to load classes in PSR-0, PEAR and include_path convention.
Dnia 28 marca 2012 12:36 Kornel Lesiński <kor...@geekhood.net> napisał(a): > On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:57:49 +0100, Mario Schroeder > <m...@marioschroeder.com> wrote: > > > the Support for PHP5.3 Namespaces is even planned. Can you tell at what > > point this will be available? > > I've had an experimental namespaced version, but decided not to switch. > > 1. PHPTAL has prefixed classes already, so it doesn't conflict with > anything. There is no necessity. > > 2. Users are not expected to use many classes other than simply "PHPTAL" > class, so aliasing does not really shorten any PHPTAL-using code. > > 3. Keeping backwards compatibility with pre-NS code is not trivial. > > 4. In general I'm dissatisfied with PHP namespace implementation: > > http://pornel.net/phpns > > _______________________________________________ PHPTAL mailing list PHPTAL@lists.motion-twin.com http://lists.motion-twin.com/mailman/listinfo/phptal
