The problem was that the javascript "programs" themselves are GPL. See threads
http://www.nabble.com/Cobertura-%2B-downloaded-sites-concern-to14974449.html#a14974449
http://www.nabble.com/-all--Cobertura...-to15654446.html#a15654446
http://apache.markmail.org/message/luukuehijisvoawo#query:+page
Am 16.07.2009 um 13:41 schrieb allain:
> I do mean such a thing. I'm not used to having the parent's pom file
> split into a subdirecty. My bad. Thanks.
BTW: I really like the growing green in there. You're a gifted
gardener ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Picco
I do mean such a thing. I'm not used to having the parent's pom file
split into a subdirecty. My bad. Thanks.
On Jul 16, 5:54 am, Marcus Rohrmoser wrote:
> now it's me who can't follow. Cobertura? You don't mean such a
> thing:http://files.getdropbox.com/u/965005/piccolo2d.java/site-stage/pic
now it's me who can't follow. Cobertura? You don't mean such a thing:
http://files.getdropbox.com/u/965005/piccolo2d.java/site-stage/piccolo2d-core/cobertura/index.html
- do You? That's part of the mvn build ever since.
M
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Picco
GPL itself says output from a GPL program is not covered:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput
Sam Reid
Michael Heuer wrote:
allain wrote:
My reasons for wanting to do this are:
- Obviously Code Coverage Metrics are good but this one is IDE
agnostic.
- It has a Hu
allain wrote:
> My reasons for wanting to do this are:
> - Obviously Code Coverage Metrics are good but this one is IDE
> agnostic.
> - It has a Hudson plugin that can be installed allowing us to diagram
> the (hopefully) increasing progression of code coverage over time in a
> nice convenient gr
