[piccolo2d-dev] Re: Any objections to me adding Cobertura coverage report to the Maven Build?

2009-07-16 Thread Marcus Rohrmoser
now it's me who can't follow. Cobertura? You don't mean such a thing: http://files.getdropbox.com/u/965005/piccolo2d.java/site-stage/piccolo2d-core/cobertura/index.html - do You? That's part of the mvn build ever since. M --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[piccolo2d-dev] Re: Any objections to me adding Cobertura coverage report to the Maven Build?

2009-07-16 Thread allain
I do mean such a thing. I'm not used to having the parent's pom file split into a subdirecty. My bad. Thanks. On Jul 16, 5:54 am, Marcus Rohrmoser mr0...@mro.name wrote: now it's me who can't follow. Cobertura? You don't mean such a

[piccolo2d-dev] Re: Any objections to me adding Cobertura coverage report to the Maven Build?

2009-07-16 Thread Marcus Rohrmoser
Am 16.07.2009 um 13:41 schrieb allain: I do mean such a thing. I'm not used to having the parent's pom file split into a subdirecty. My bad. Thanks. BTW: I really like the growing green in there. You're a gifted gardener ;-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~

[piccolo2d-dev] Re: Any objections to me adding Cobertura coverage report to the Maven Build?

2009-07-16 Thread Michael Heuer
The problem was that the javascript programs themselves are GPL. See threads http://www.nabble.com/Cobertura-%2B-downloaded-sites-concern-to14974449.html#a14974449 http://www.nabble.com/-all--Cobertura...-to15654446.html#a15654446

[piccolo2d-dev] Re: Any objections to me adding Cobertura coverage report to the Maven Build?

2009-07-15 Thread Michael Heuer
allain wrote: My reasons for wanting to do this are: - Obviously Code Coverage Metrics are good but this one is IDE agnostic. - It has a Hudson plugin that can be installed allowing us to diagram the (hopefully) increasing progression of code coverage over time in a nice convenient graph.

[piccolo2d-dev] Re: Any objections to me adding Cobertura coverage report to the Maven Build?

2009-07-15 Thread Samuel Robert Reid
GPL itself says output from a GPL program is not covered: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput Sam Reid Michael Heuer wrote: allain wrote: My reasons for wanting to do this are: - Obviously Code Coverage Metrics are good but this one is IDE agnostic. - It has a