On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 08:22:01AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Tight, this would work in the current situation.
Mistype: I meant "Right", not "Tight" ;-)
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:23:11PM -0300, TC-Rucho wrote:
> If it's about checking single characters, why not just:
>
>(de sub? (Ch Str)
> (member Ch (chop Str) )
>
> so rewriting this:
>
>(or (= X ",") (= X ".") (= X "?"))
>
> as
>
>(sub? X ",.?")
>
> would work just fine.
>
> (de sub? (Pat Str)
> (and
> (match (cons '@ (conc (chop Pat) '@)) (chop Str))
> Str ) )
>
> or
>
> (de sub? (Pat Str)
> (setq Pat (chop Pat))
> (and
> (seek
>'((L) (head Pat L))
>(chop Str) )
> Str ) )
>
> (is there a be
