Hi Christophe,
> Christophe Gragnic writes:
>> It should be possible to
>> find the original values from another instance of picolisp, for example.
>
> Is it always possible?
try it:
in 1st console:
$ ~/picoLisp/p
: call
-> 267631
: ^d
in 2nd console:
$ ~/picoLisp/p
: call
-> 267631
: ^d
Th
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>
> could you elaborate on this a bit?
Sorry, I cannot give you better info that what is in the ref:
http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.6/TclCmd/interp.htm#M4
chri
--
http://profgra.org/lycee/ (site pro)
http://delicious.com/profgraorg (liens,
Christophe Gragnic
writes:
Hi Christophe,
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Tomas Hlavaty
>> Or simply call something that crashes PicoLisp, e.g.
>> […]
>
> Here comes the power of embedded interpreters, which PicoLisp
> does not have.
could you elaborate on this a bit?
--
cheers,
Thorsten
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
>
> […] it is unsafe by design.
> […]
> even if you bind those symbols to 'prog', an attacker could set them to
> the original values, which are simple numbers.
Hey, this is a very nice idea and answer to my question of safe interps.
> It shou
