Ok, Danilo... How about this then? :) http://www.technoblogy.com/show?1GX1
N.B. It's still "micro", not "pico"... I don't know how to evaluate a lisp engine/language spec, but I know that picolisp is older and more widely used (and it feels right to me). Cheers, --Dave > From: Danilo Kordic > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 7:02 AM > > Interesting. Well nice try, I wouldn't call it v1.0 :D . It's Arduino (not > AVR!), nuf' said. > >> From: Loyall, David >> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:50 AM >> >> Perhaps picolisp can learn something from this project, but I expect they >> can learn more from picolisp. >> >> http://www.ulisp.com/