Re: A possible way to build for windows

Hi Kashyap, > I have been considering the idea of getting picolisp to run on windows > (without a heavy weight setup - cygwin/mingw) for a while now. What if I > try and target nasm instead of gnu assembler? That should work. Regarding I have not looked at nasm. This is probably not trivial, it

Re: Another newbie question

Hi Kashyap, > I was trying to follow through what happens when I run (de f (x y) (+ x y)) > using printf debugging in minipicolisp. > > If I understand correctly, "de" is read in at io.c:385 if (x = > isIntern(tail(y), > Intern)) Correct. Here the symbol 'de' is read - and thus either found in

Another newbie question

Hi, I was trying to follow through what happens when I run (de f (x y) (+ x y)) using printf debugging in minipicolisp. If I understand correctly, "de" is read in at io.c:385 if (x = isIntern(tail(y), Intern)) However, what I am having some trouble understanding is - when does the mapping to

A possible way to build for windows

Hi, I have been considering the idea of getting picolisp to run on windows (without a heavy weight setup - cygwin/mingw) for a while now. What if I try and target nasm instead of gnu assembler? That should work. Regarding the POSIX dependency, I think it should be a matter of making all the