Re: Question about assembly in x86-64.l

HI, Is there a mailing list for beginners learning this language or can they pose questions here. I am facing a challenge to figure this out, : (setq *Scl 2) -> 2 : (** (+ 1.0 0.01) 24) -> 1269734648531914468903714880493455422104626762401 Now, how to get the correct result of the computation (

Re: Question about assembly in x86-64.l

Hi Kashyap, > I'll need some help understanding the PIC code a bit - can you please give > an example in the generated picolisp assembly that relies on position > dependent code? For ppc64 and arm64 *all* code is position independent, i.e. all memory accesses are always relative to the program

Unsubscribe

Re: Question about assembly in x86-64.l

Hi Kashyap, I think Alex means as of the moment PilASM does not support PIC, its the Mac side that insist to use PIC. Btw, great job on this port and looking forward to this! Actually I did try to port Picolisp on Mac when I had a MacBook Air from my previous work, but it was only for Pil32

Re: Question about assembly in x86-64.l

Hi Alex, I'll need some help understanding the PIC code a bit - can you please give an example in the generated picolisp assembly that relies on position dependent code? Regards, Kashyap On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:28 AM Alexander Burger wrote: > > Btw ... just want to double check here - there

unsubscribe

Hello. I haven't enough time for it. Have a good day!

Re: Question about assembly in x86-64.l

> Btw ... just want to double check here - there is no way to run picolisp64 > on mac today right? Yes, because the Mac has a x86-64 CPU and insists to run position independend code, which is not supported by src64/arch/x86-64.l (at least not currently, and would be a major rewrite). It would

Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe

Re: Question about assembly in x86-64.l

I agree, having an LLVM target would be a very good idea. I surely hope someone picks up on it soon :) .. I'd like to finish of the nasm target - atleast try to run it on Linux and Mac before I move on. Btw ... just want to double check here - there is no way to run picolisp64 on mac today right?

Re: Unsubscribe me

Hi all, in case anybody else wants to unsubscribe: Please write "Unsubscribe" as subject, not "Please unsubscribe me" or something. Or just do mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe Otherwise the deletion from the list won't work! The two cases just now I remove manually. ☺/

Unsubscribe me

Unsubscribe

Unsubscribe request

Please unsubscribe me. Thank you. On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:40 PM C K Kashyap wrote: > Hi, > > I've been hacking on PicoLisp in the last couple of days and I noticed a > couple of things that I have to say it out (the bliss is too hard to keep > inside)! > > The sense of liberation I feel