Hi Jakob,
> > Oops, yes, very good! That's a bug in 'dm', in the place where the
> > values are compared. I've fixed it.
>
> A bug in Erzats?
Yes, that's right. In Ersatz.
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
On December 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> > (dm T (X Y) (=: x X) (=: y Y))
> > and then repeat the last line, then Ersatz will say "# T +Shape
> > redefined", but 32-bit PicoLisp will give no such "redefined" warning. It
> > may not matter very much, I just wanted to
Hi Jon,
> (dm T (X Y) (=: x X) (=: y Y))
> and then repeat the last line, then Ersatz will say "# T +Shape redefined",
> but 32-bit PicoLisp will give no such "redefined" warning. It may not matter
> very much, I just wanted to mention it. (I haven’t tried 64-bit.)
Oops, yes, very good! That's
Hi,
If you do
(class +Shape)
(dm T (X Y) (=: x X) (=: y Y))
and then repeat the last line, then Ersatz will say "# T +Shape redefined", but
32-bit PicoLisp will give no such "redefined" warning. It may not matter very
much, I just wanted to mention it. (I haven’t tried 64-bit.)
Ersatz does no
