Re: +Idx problems maybe?

2009-11-03 Thread Henrik Sarvell
I'll try with the one you suggested, thanks for the clarifications! /Henrik On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrot= e: Hi Henrik, I took a look at the pilog file, I already get what same and range are doing but what are part, head and fold doing? You are

Re: +Idx problems maybe?

2009-11-02 Thread Henrik Sarvell
I did the rebuild but I'm still not getting any results when running the above query and I know for a fact that I should be getting at least two. Doing the scan gives me a long list, this is the end of it: (zerosum dirt(nap) - Home . {8o}) {8o} (zhou {BH}) {BH} (ziDesigns - Zaigham's Corner //

Re: +Idx problems maybe?

2009-11-02 Thread Henrik Sarvell
Oops seems like the substring matching wasn't case insensitive... Do I have to take care of that explicitly or is there some sibling of tolr that will do case insensitive searches too? I took a look at the pilog file, I already get what same and range are doing but what are part, head and fold

Re: +Idx problems maybe?

2009-11-02 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Henrik, I took a look at the pilog file, I already get what same and range are doing but what are part, head and fold doing? You are on the right track. You used 'tolr', but this actually makes sense only in combination with the '+Sn' (Soundex) prefix. The whole matter is rather