Re: Recursion-Loop Macro?

There is lots of discussion on the mail archive on this topic over the years. http://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp@software-lab.de/msg03860.html There are others. Try searching tail recursion, macros, fexpr. The mail archive has been an excellent source of information on picolisp. I haven't

Re: Recursion-Loop Macro?

I will think about doing a f-expr for that. Am 12.02.2017 11:50 schrieb "Mike Pechkin" : > write yourself recursion call and you will see you don't need macro. > > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Christopher Howard < > christopher.how...@qlfiles.net> wrote: > >> Hi

Re: Recursion-Loop Macro?

write yourself recursion call and you will see you don't need macro. On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Christopher Howard < christopher.how...@qlfiles.net> wrote: > Hi list. I got the impression from some of the documentation that we > aren't planning to implement TCO in picoLisp, and that the

Recursion-Loop Macro?

Hi list. I got the impression from some of the documentation that we aren't planning to implement TCO in picoLisp, and that the preferred approach is to just use a loop. I don't want to argue against that, but I was just wondering if perhaps somebody had a macro that made a loop look like a