Re: Yet Another Emacs PicoLisp Mode - hybrid

2019-07-07 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
already tested by you (and others) so I can accept the PR without extra testing? BTW It would be nice to have even one more PicoLisp mode for Emacs! There is this new concept of LSP out there now (Language Server Protocol), with the basic idea that every language implements the server side o

Re: Yet Another Emacs PicoLisp Mode - hybrid

2019-06-18 Thread rick
on't want to muddy the waters further by creating yet another > picolisp-mode ... No worries. I like the variety. Variation breeds innovation. (Glad, for instance, that Alex was not worried about writing "yet another lisp" -- and we all benefit!) > I would be happy to make a

Yet Another Emacs PicoLisp Mode - hybrid

2019-06-17 Thread Grant Shangreaux
Hello list, I am a long time Emacs user, and currently a Spacemacs user as well. Spacemacs is lacking a configuration layer for PicoLisp and I decided to go ahead and put one together. While doing so, I was trying to decide which version of `picolisp-mode` to use. I've tried the packaged .el

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-29 Thread Kan-Ru Chen
-installed picolisp-mode that comes with the distribution. It's a small file but provides good experience for first-time picolisp user. I thought not a small portion of picolisp users may also be Emacs users, but I could be wrong ;) From what I read so far, it seems there are two or three

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-24 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
an) > Date: January 25, 2019 0:00:08 JST > To: "Jean-Christophe Helary" > > Hi, > > a- I can see the melpa picolisp-mode fine. I'm not sure what you mean > "invisible"? > > b- No, the paredit patch is not applied. > > c- picolisp-wiki-mode.el

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-23 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
e emacs package manager > when you look for it", if you mean that you can't see it when you look at the > list generated by `package-list-packages` That's correct. > Well, if you load a picolisp source file (*.l) and you are in some > picolisp-mode and you didn't cause that to

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-23 Thread rick
Hi Jean-Christophe! Sorry, I forgot to address the other things you mentioned. On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 02:33 -05:00, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > The discussion is not about changing anything for people who already > use one or the other mode. It is about proposing something easy to > use *and*

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-23 Thread rick
clear, there is no "picolisp official mode" or even "official picolisp mode". Certainly, Alex does not claim this; he is only including a version of picolisp-mode in the picolisp distro for the user's convenience. He started doing this probably way before there was eve

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread rick
Hi Jean-Christophe! On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 02:33 -05:00, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > There is also a maintenance issue for the official mode. From what I > understand, there seems to be 3 different versions of that mode and the > authors are not active anymore (and have not been for 6

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
Rick, Thank you for explaining your position. My wording may have been clumsy but I agree with everything you write. The discussion is not about changing anything for people who already use one or the other mode. It is about proposing something easy to use *and* not confusing to new comers.

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread rick
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 16:11 -05:00, Alexis wrote: > Having said all that, if the PicoLisp community generally felt it > would be best to settle on the mode currently bundled with the > distribution as /the/ Emacs mode for PicoLisp, and wanted me to > remove my mode from MELPA - or at least, rename

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread rick
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:47 -05:00, andr...@itship.ch wrote: > In the end everyone should use whatever fits that person the best, > we don't need one way to rule them all. > > - beneroth Exactly. Well said, beneroth. I too am an emacs user. I use tj's picolisp-mode. I'm glad

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
have no idea that anything is installed until you load a picolisp file. It also could be that the paredit patch is applied, it could be that the picolisp-wiki mode is installed as well, but there is no visible trace of that. 2) Similarly, on Debian, the alternative picolisp mode from Alexis is

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Alexis
andr...@itship.ch writes: I greatly enjoy using paredit, which works well. I have not tried out the other emacs modules for picolisp, and I don't know if the one in MELPA works well with paredit, which I see as the essential feature for an emacs picolisp-mode. i myself don't use paredit

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread andreas
I'm working with picolisp and emacs, also using the older picolisp-mode which comes with the picolisp distribution (the official upstream one from http://software-lab.de/down.html). I greatly enjoy using paredit, which works well. I have not tried out the other emacs modules for picolisp

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
direct access to the picolisp distribution 2) most emacs users would use the emacs package manager to search for a picolisp mode Maybe it would be better to refer to available packages in the documentation and let people use the one they like ? Jean-Christophe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Alexander Burger
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:41:24PM +0900, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote: > The problem is that on Debian (and derivatives) the most recent mode that > Alexis has developed is not available. I discovered that when I found > discrepancies between the mode in raspian and the mode on my Mac when I

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
the most recent mode that Alexis has developed is not available. I discovered that when I found discrepancies between the mode in raspian and the mode on my Mac when I was sshing to raspian. If you have time, give the melpa mode a try, it is available from Github: https://github.com/flexibeas

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Manuel Cano
Hi, As an Emacs user, it would be nice to have Picolisp package in Debian updated. I use Emacs but I've tweaked some other lisp libs. I don't use MELPA either. Kind regards, Manu El mar., 22 ene. 2019 a las 10:20, Jean-Christophe Helary (< brandel...@gmail.com>) escribió: > > > On Jan 22,

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-22 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
> On Jan 22, 2019, at 15:58, Alexander Burger wrote: > > Hi all, > > Or should we change the one in the distribution? I can do that, but as a > non-emacs user I don't know exactly what is needed. So if there is a general > agreement, please let me know what I should do. It would be nice to

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-21 Thread Alexander Burger
ead: > >If the time comes that users start saying that picolisp-mode >on MELPA should be the official version then lets cross that >road when we get there. > > If people here would now like me to rename my mode, i'd be happy to initiate > that process. Or sho

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-21 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
Alexis, Wow :) Thank you for the information. My current issue is that Debian installs the distribution picolisp-mode by default and for some reason the melpa package (yours) is not available. Also, on Debian (well, it was Raspbian but I guess that's the same), when you open a picolisp file

Re: picolisp-mode

2019-01-21 Thread Alexis
comes that users start saying that picolisp-mode on MELPA should be the official version then lets cross that road when we get there. If people here would now like me to rename my mode, i'd be happy to initiate that process. Alexis. -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject

picolisp-mode

2019-01-21 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
There are currently 2 picolisp modes for emacs, one is distributed with picolisp and the other is on melpa. Is there a reason for that ? Jean-Christophe Helary --- http://mac4translators.blogspot.com @brandelune -- UNSUBSCRIBE:

Re: GNU Emacs picolisp-mode

2018-11-12 Thread Henrik Sarvell
Hi Alex, I don't know, too many changes too long ago, I have to do a diff against the one in the standard release and see if I can detect something weird first. On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 12:42 PM Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2018 at 12:36:27AM +0700, Henrik Sarvell wrote:

Re: GNU Emacs picolisp-mode

2018-10-09 Thread Tedd M. V.
Henrik Sarvell writes: > I attached my slightly modified version. Cool, thank you! ;-) -- -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GAT d- s+:+ a? C UL P+ L+++ E+ W+++ N+ o-- K+ w O-- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t+ 5 X+ R tv- b+++ DI-- D+ G++ e* h! r- z* --END GEEK CODE

Re: GNU Emacs picolisp-mode

2018-10-05 Thread Henrik Sarvell
ot;If you prefer to use Emacs, please use the picolisp-mode bundled in the > "el/" directory (that is "@lib/el" for a local installation, or some > system dependent directory for a global installation)." > > > I imply that somewhere in the installation a .el f

Re: GNU Emacs picolisp-mode

2018-09-12 Thread Tedd M. V.
t; "If you prefer to use Emacs, please use the picolisp-mode bundled in the >> "el/" directory (that is "@lib/el" for a local installation, or some >> system dependent directory for a global installation)." >> >> >> I imply that somewhere in t

Re: GNU Emacs picolisp-mode

2018-09-12 Thread Simon Saville
'picolisp-mode' is available to use, as is the inferior-picolisp I realise that there are probably differences in packaging between debian & ubuntu, but they both use the same dpkg system. This might help you find out what's going on. Maybe, drop a note to the package maintainer? Simon On Tue, 11