Hi Michael,
yeah you right, i will do it in general list at first, thanks for advice.
чт, 17 янв. 2019 г. в 19:22, Michel Pelletier :
> Hi Abel,
>
> Great work, I'll give it a shot on pg 10 and 11 later today at work. As
> for the mailing lists, I'd start with pgsql-general mailing list
Hi Abel,
Great work, I'll give it a shot on pg 10 and 11 later today at work. As
for the mailing lists, I'd start with pgsql-general mailing list before the
-hackers list, the same core devs watch both lists so you'll get the same
high grade advice. They'll let you know if you should promote
Hi Abel,
> Also mmamkin connected with me directly and also suggested to use prefix "pg-"
> for whole library not only for public functions. I think that I probably
> should to use namespaces to hide private functions.
I would also recommend namespaces.
> It would be nice if someone would
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:29:17PM +0100, Danilo Kordic wrote:
> IMHO (PicoLisp) Namespaces _are_ "name" prefixes, for example "pg~"
> instead of "pg-".
>
> [de pg []] # Empty Namespace.
> [de pg~sym ~...]
No, they are not. "pg~" is not part of the name.
For example, one symbol may
IMHO (PicoLisp) Namespaces _are_ "name" prefixes, for example "pg~"
instead of "pg-".
[de pg []] # Empty Namespace.
[de pg~sym ~...]
Unfortunately Namespaces are not Association Lists, or Property Lists.
Therefore they can not be processed by predefined procedures. I must point
out
