Re: Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-10 Thread Alexander Burger
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > There is (was?) also xml.l iirc which I wrote because the original XML > parser did not support enough of XML for my use-case. You could also > compare to that. Yes, right! I attach it here. ☺/ A!ex # 24nov16abu # 21jan09 Tomas Hla

Subscribe

2025-05-10 Thread mayor84

Unsubscribe

2025-05-10 Thread Sean Case
Good bye Sean Case :-( You are now unsubscribed -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-10 Thread picolisp
Le 10/05/2025 à 07:48, Alexander Burger a écrit : > > It is just that (car Cells-References) came unexpected to me, because if > 'Cells-References' holds an XML structure, then its CAR cannot be a > list. It is always ( . ). > Ah! Yes, I should have specified that it had already been converted…

Re: Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-10 Thread picolisp
Le 10/05/2025 à 09:35, Alexander Burger a écrit : > On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 09:12:53AM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: >> There is (was?) also xml.l iirc which I wrote because the original XML >> parser did not support enough of XML for my use-case. You could also >> compare to that. > > Yes, right!

Re: Regression in xm.l after changes in 'body' and 'attr' functions?

2025-05-10 Thread Tomas Hlavaty
On Fri 09 May 2025 at 19:30, picolisp@software-lab.de wrote: > compare with my usage in my code. There is (was?) also xml.l iirc which I wrote because the original XML parser did not support enough of XML for my use-case. You could also compare to that. -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-