Hi,
I wanted to look at the old problem of building 64-bit PicoLisp on Mac OS
X. Assemblers are far from what I usually play with, but at least I'd like
to spend a few hours today on this problem.
From what I've found on the net, I got the impression that the standard
(?) assembler on OSX is
I thougt PicoLisp used its' own assembler?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Jon Kleiser wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to look at the old problem of building 64-bit PicoLisp on Mac OS
X. Assemblers are far from what I usually play with, but at least I'd like
to spend a few hours today on
Hi Alex,
Hi Jon,
I wanted to look at the old problem of building 64-bit PicoLisp on Mac
OS
Great! :)
..
I hope this gives you some hints to get started. We can try to tackle
this together once we find out what exactly goes wrong.
Cheers,
- Alex
It's probably best to continue this on
Hi Jon,
It's probably best to continue this on IRC. I have some other business for
about one hour. I'll log in when I'm ready.
OK, fine. See you!
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Jakob,
I thougt PicoLisp used its' own assembler?
Well, yes and no.
The assembly language PicoLisp is written in, is its' own. It is
described in http://software-lab.de/doc64/asm; (language and virtual
CPU architecture).
The build procedure (triggered by the script src64/mkAsm) translates
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
As far as I remember, the only remaining problem was not that of the
assembler, but of the linker, or, more correctly, the final output file
format.
The last time we discussed it here was: