Hi LawrenceNice you're taking part here!You're basically on the right track, but I think the things you mention don't work here, as picoLisp is strictly an interpreted language, there is no layer between source code and execution where such a name-mangling could happen.The source code IS the
Even if that were so, couldn't we fix this with a convention in the module
loader? That is, the loader concatenates all files into one upon loading.
Is this crazy talk?
On February 10, 2015 9:47:54 AM CET, andr...@itship.ch wrote:
Hi Lawrence
Nice you're taking part here!
You're basically
Afaik, that should work :-)
I thought about a loader doing this, but I didn't think about mixing it with the present namespace system.
Great ideas Jakob! - Original Message - From: Jakob Eriksson [mailto:ja...@aurorasystems.eu] To: picolisp@software-lab.de Sent: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:11:17
New install. Put picoLisp in ~/opt/picoLisp/ Then I created an alias for
the pil:
alias pil='~/opt/picoLisp/pil +'
This works fine from shell; starts up REPL. However emacs can't start the
REPL (run-picolisp):
Searching for program: no such file or directory, pil
What can I do to make emacs
