On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:56:55PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> >
> > crashes? What is in the temp stack? Perhaps it is the fixed prin/prinl
> > issue of anonymous symbols.
> >
> >
> tempStack is list, look how it prints when not crashed
>
> http://pastebin.com/mTj51y4B
Yes, anonymous symbols.
>
> crashes? What is in the temp stack? Perhaps it is the fixed prin/prinl
> issue of anonymous symbols.
>
>
tempStack is list, look how it prints when not crashed
http://pastebin.com/mTj51y4B
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:17:13PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> > Perhaps you can 'trace' to locate the exact place?
> >
> >
> http://pastebin.com/kb6DGxpN
OK, so
(prinl "tempStack: " (: tempStack))
crashes? What is in the temp stack? Perhaps it is the fixed prin/prinl
issue of anonymous symb
> Perhaps you can 'trace' to locate the exact place?
>
>
http://pastebin.com/kb6DGxpN
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 05:55:45PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> As I wrote before, it didnt crash always
>
> http://pastebin.com/JkVkBjbQ
> ...
> http://pastebin.com/mTj51y4B
I can't produce a crash here :(
Perhaps you can 'trace' to locate the exact place?
At the end of "forth.l" put (traceA
I decided write here, not in irc
As I wrote before, it didnt crash always
http://pastebin.com/JkVkBjbQ
modified code for demonstration:
(dm _t_ () # just for testing
(println (: tempStack))
(prinl "tempStack: " (: tempStack)) )
http://pastebin.com/mTj51y4B
Hi Jon,
> Thanks, Alex! I’ll give it a try a little later, but I’m sure it works.
Strange thing is that I cannot reproduce the bug, even with an older,
non-fixed version of pil32.
Can you try to locate the exact point of failure?
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=
Thanks, Alex! I’ll give it a try a little later, but I’m sure it works.
/Jon
> On 26. aug. 2016, at 18.23, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
>> Must be my fault. I never had the idea to 'prinl' an anonymous symbol
>> ('prinl' just low-
