Re: List graph library?

2017-04-05 Thread Alexander Burger
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:56:12PM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > Hi. Does somebody have a FOSS library handy for graphing a picolisp list > (like, hierarchically)? Say, SVG format or something? I can't imagine > somebody else hasn't already tackled that problem... Besides for a full-blown

Re: List graph library?

2017-04-05 Thread Michel Pelletier
It would be pretty easy to generate 'dot' from picolisp: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOT_(graph_description_language) On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Christopher Howard < christopher.how...@qlfiles.net> wrote: > Hi. Does somebody have a FOSS library handy for graphing a picolisp list > (like,

Re: Which emacs mode to use?

2017-04-05 Thread Tim Johnson
Thanks Chris : * Christopher Howard [170405 17:24]: > Hi, I was referring to the lib/el folder inside the picolisp source > archive from http://software-lab.de/picoLisp-16.12.tgz. > > I followed the manual installation instructions so that my picolisp is >

Re: Which emacs mode to use?

2017-04-05 Thread Christopher Howard
Hi, I was referring to the lib/el folder inside the picolisp source archive from http://software-lab.de/picoLisp-16.12.tgz. I followed the manual installation instructions so that my picolisp is installed at /usr/local/src/picoLisp. And so I just added this to my ~/.emacs: (add-to-list

Re: Which emacs mode to use?

2017-04-05 Thread Tim Johnson
Well ... somebody more knowledgeable than I did respond. :) * Christopher Howard [170405 16:47]: > Hi, I figured somebody more knowledgeable would respond, but since they > didn't... > > I've had a good experience with the emacs-mode included in the >

List graph library?

2017-04-05 Thread Christopher Howard
Hi. Does somebody have a FOSS library handy for graphing a picolisp list (like, hierarchically)? Say, SVG format or something? I can't imagine somebody else hasn't already tackled that problem... -- https://qlfiles.net -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Evaluation misstep in tag function

2017-04-05 Thread Bruno Franco
Ah, I see! So, its for convenience that the atoms are printed. And the reason `(+ 1 1) was printed was that it was first evaluated to 2, *then* passed to , who only ever saw the atom 2. Thanks Alex. On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > >

Re: Evaluation misstep in tag function

2017-04-05 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Bruno, > I'm going through the picolisp application development tutorial ( > http://software-lab.de/doc/app.html#tags) and I'm trying this piece of code > at the tags section: > > : ( 'main >( NIL "Head") >( NIL > ( "Line 1") > "Line" > () > (+ 1 1) ) ) > Head