Hi Mattias,
I’ve found a few more glitches:
doc/form/refF.html, line 101: A missing “”
doc/form/refF.html, line 104: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refO.html, line 100: A missing “”
doc/form/refQ.html, line 20: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refS.html, line 67: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refV.html, line 17: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refV.html, line 19: “” should have been “”
There are also quite a few places like in doc/form/form.html, lines 69, 79 and
83, where I think “” should have been coded like “foo”.
And Alex:
doc/app.html, line 2208: “ On 20. Jan, 2017, at 19:37, Mattias Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hello Jon,
>
>> In the docs there are lots of occurrences (2325) of “”, and also
>> some (751, mainly within doc/form/) of “”. I haven’t checked
>> which one is the most correct. However, in doc/form/refC.html, line 82,
>> there’s a bad mix:
>>
>> +Chg
>
> I'll change refC.html. Thanks for noticing!
>
>> I suspect there may be more of this mixed kind, but I don’t have time to
>> check it right now.
>
> There probably is, along with other oversights. I am a bit busy this
> weekend, but I will start going through the form docs and make
> corrections as soon as possible. Good to see the docs being used!
>
> // Mattias
PԔ � )mX�����zV�u�.n7�