Re: In the docs: within or vice versa, more glitches

2017-01-25 Thread Mattias Sundblad
Hi Jon,

> It seems you forgot something in doc/form/refF.html, line 101. I guess there 
> should have been “Formatting” just before the final “.”

Seems so, added the missing word.

Regards,
Mattias
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Re: In the docs: within or vice versa, more glitches

2017-01-25 Thread Jon Kleiser
Hi Mattias,

It seems you forgot something in doc/form/refF.html, line 101. I guess there 
should have been “Formatting” just before the final “.”

/Jon

> On 23. Jan, 2017, at 14:12, Mattias Sundblad  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jon,
> 
>> I’ve found a few more glitches:
> 
> Thanks, I'll go through them and change the files.
> 
> Regards,
> Mattias
> -- 



Re: In the docs: within or vice versa, more glitches

2017-01-23 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jon,

> And Alex:
> doc/app.html, line 2208: “

Re: In the docs: within or vice versa, more glitches

2017-01-23 Thread Jon Kleiser
Hi Mattias,

I’ve found a few more glitches:

doc/form/refF.html, line 101: A missing “”
doc/form/refF.html, line 104: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refO.html, line 100: A missing “”
doc/form/refQ.html, line 20: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refS.html, line 67: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refV.html, line 17: “” should have been “”
doc/form/refV.html, line 19: “” should have been “”

There are also quite a few places like in doc/form/form.html, lines 69, 79 and 
83, where I think “” should have been coded like “foo”.

And Alex:

doc/app.html, line 2208: “ On 20. Jan, 2017, at 19:37, Mattias Sundblad  wrote:
> 
> Hello Jon,
> 
>> In the docs there are lots of occurrences (2325) of “”, and also 
>> some (751, mainly within doc/form/) of “”. I haven’t checked 
>> which one is the most correct. However, in doc/form/refC.html, line 82, 
>> there’s a bad mix:
>> 
>> +Chg
> 
> I'll change refC.html. Thanks for noticing!
> 
>> I suspect there may be more of this mixed kind, but I don’t have time to 
>> check it right now.
> 
> There probably is, along with other oversights. I am a bit busy this
> weekend, but I will start going through the form docs and make
> corrections as soon as possible. Good to see the docs being used!
> 
> // Mattias

PԔ � )mX�����zV�u�.n7�