Re: Java Interoperability - Why bother with Clojure?

2015-02-02 Thread Jakob Eriksson
On 02/02/15 15:50, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Jakob, > >> Which makes me wonder about Ersatz PicoLisp though. >> How would it stand against other JVM alternatives? I know that Ersatz is >> not as >> fast as native PicoLisp. But for instance Groovy, is really slow on the JVM. >> Maybe Ersatz woul

Re: Java Interoperability - Why bother with Clojure?

2015-02-02 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jakob, > Which makes me wonder about Ersatz PicoLisp though. > How would it stand against other JVM alternatives? I know that Ersatz is > not as > fast as native PicoLisp. But for instance Groovy, is really slow on the JVM. > Maybe Ersatz would be fast enough for serious work too, if Groovy is.

Re: Java Interoperability - Why bother with Clojure?

2015-02-02 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Interesting development you have there, connecting the JVM to PicoLisp proper. Which makes me wonder about Ersatz PicoLisp though. How would it stand against other JVM alternatives? I know that Ersatz is not as fast as native PicoLisp. But for instance Groovy, is really slow on the JVM. Maybe Ersa

Java Interoperability - Why bother with Clojure?

2015-02-02 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi all! A new library to call Java code from/to PicoLisp: http://picolisp.com/wiki/?javaCode ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe