>> * one implementation is canonical: amd64
>
>Meanwhile, I feel, the arm64 implementation the is primary one.
Good to know! Yes, I think arm will become/remain dominate for a while.
Cheers,
--Dave L.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:34:23PM +, Loyall, David wrote:
> This is a guess: the original asker is more familiar with Common Lisp than
> picolisp.
>
> So, a fair answer would be to describe picolisp in terms that CL users are
> familiar with.
>
> Sorry, I'm not qualified to do that
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 05:07:46PM +0200, andr...@itship.ch wrote:
> Disclaimer: I don't really know Common Lisp.
>
> Just a try, use it as inspiration not as answer, would need re-wording to be
> used as quora answer:
>
> - they're about the same age, both inspired by Maclisp,
> > Uh, oh, this is really tough.
>
> Just one smart paragraph.
This is a guess: the original asker is more familiar with Common Lisp than
picolisp.
So, a fair answer would be to describe picolisp in terms that CL users are
familiar with.
Sorry, I'm not qualified to do that myself. But,
software-lab.de/doc/faq.html
> See also: http://picolisp.wikidot.com/
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Mike Pechkin [mailto:mike.pech...@gmail.com]
> To: picolisp@software-lab.de
> Sent: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:58:05 +0300
> Subject: Re: PicoLisp on quora.com
>
>
: PicoLisp on quora.com
>
>
> Uh, oh, this is really tough.
Just one smart paragraph.
(mike)
>
>
> Uh, oh, this is really tough.
Just one smart paragraph.
(mike)
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 03:21:03PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> Can somebody answer to this ?
> https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-is-the-difference-between-PicoLisp-and-Common-Lisp
Uh, oh, this is really tough. I would say that almost everything is different.
Comparing Forth with Java is
hi all,
Can somebody answer to this ?
https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-is-the-difference-between-PicoLisp-and-Common-Lisp
(mike)
