Re: Pilog: Does NIL successfully unify with (@H . @T)?

Alexander Burger wrote: Hi Cle, Hi Alex, although not intended so, it seems I mutate the picoLisp mailing list into a Pilog mailing list ;-) Which is a good thing. This way we produce at last some Pilog documentation ;-) nice you see it that way :-) (be attributes

Re: Pilog: Does NIL successfully unify with (@H . @T)?

Hi Cle, although not intended so, it seems I mutate the picoLisp mailing list into a Pilog mailing list ;-) Which is a good thing. This way we produce at last some Pilog documentation ;-) (be attributes ((@H) @L @V) T (member (@H @V) @L) ) (be attributes ((@H . @) @L @V) (member