Re: The behaviour of arg

In this case I simply use (arg 1), I just wanted to check if perhaps (arg) defaulted to (arg 1) if no prior next had been called. On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi Henrik, Andreas, > >> I guess this is the unforgiving punishment for calling (arg)

Re: The behaviour of arg

Hi Henrik, Andreas, > I guess this is the unforgiving punishment for calling (arg) without > calling (next) previously, consider the reference: > "If cnt is not given, the value that was returned from the last call > to next" -> no previous call to next -> invalid usage -> punishment Exactly! In

RE: The behaviour of arg

lisp@software-lab.de Sent: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:08:04 +0100 Subject: The behaviour of arg Hi Alex and list. If I do like this: (de atst @ (println (arg)) ) (atst 1 2 3) (bye) I never reach (bye) and I can't even abort with ctrl-c or d (had to kill -9), is there a reason for this unforgivin

The behaviour of arg

Hi Alex and list. If I do like this: (de atst @ (println (arg)) ) (atst 1 2 3) (bye) I never reach (bye) and I can't even abort with ctrl-c or d (had to kill -9), is there a reason for this unforgiving punishment of arg abuse or did I find some minor bug? -- UNSUBSCRIBE: