This was interesting! Just saw pixielang on HN.
> 17 jan. 2017 kl. 22:28 skrev Mike Pechkin :
>
> Author of http://pixielang.org/ in the city.
> Welcome to community
>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Timothy Baldridge
>> wrote:
>> > Check link in archive:
>> >https://web.archive.org/web/20
Author of http://pixielang.org/ in the city.
Welcome to community
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Timothy Baldridge
wrote:
> > Check link in archive:
> >https://web.archive.org/web/20150308140349/http://
> kazimirmajorinc.com/Documents/The-speed-of-eval-in-some-
> Lisp-implementations/index.htm
Hi Mike,
> Check link in archive:
> https://web.archive.org/web/20150308140349/http://kazimirmajorinc.com/Documents/The-speed-of-eval-in-some-Lisp-implementations/index.html
>
> Lets update PicoLisp (17.1.7) times and compare with other dialects.
> Demo code for time3 by @taij33n:
> (bench
>(
> Check link in archive:
>
https://web.archive.org/web/20150308140349/http://kazimirmajorinc.com/Documents/The-speed-of-eval-in-some-Lisp-implementations/index.html
As a Clojure programmer, I find that Clojure code rather...gross. Of course
it's slow, Clojure is optimized completely differently fr
hi,
Check link in archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150308140349/http://kazimirmajorinc.com/Documents/The-speed-of-eval-in-some-Lisp-implementations/index.html
Lets update PicoLisp (17.1.7) times and compare with other dialects.
Demo code for time3 by @taij33n:
(bench
(let N 100