Great! To add to the dialog, I am not surprised by co/in-row being
similar. I might have actually thought that co would be slightly
slower. This task is CPU bound which won't get any benefit from
switching coroutines, whereas later spawns new processes (workers) to
take advantage of multi-core.
Th
Hi Mike,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 05:01:24PM +0200, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> https://bitbucket.org/mihailp/tankfeeder/raw/43d62edb11d56b4ffada4f728ab59b5455c97fbc/pow.l
>
> https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Proof_of_work
Great news! Thanks!
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject
hi,
https://bitbucket.org/mihailp/tankfeeder/raw/43d62edb11d56b4ffada4f728ab59b5455c97fbc/pow.l
https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Proof_of_work
I've implement more two versions for calculation Bitmessage POW on (later)
and (co) functions. It works.
environment:
o) DELL PowerEdge 430 (modern)
o) Cento