Re: lisp assumption validation

2011-03-14 Thread Alexander Burger
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 08:52:37AM +0100, meingbg wrote: creating a lisp function is a function call to (de). since lisp has a reputation of being a functional language, this observation is interesting. Lisp, and picolisp in particular, is quite imperative Indeed. This can be seen, for

Re: lisp assumption validation

2011-03-14 Thread dexen deVries
On Monday 14 of March 2011 08:52:37 you wrote: creating a lisp function is a function call to (de). =20 since lisp has a reputation of being a functional language, this observation is interesting. Lisp, and picolisp in particular, is quite imperative althought it can be programmed in a

Re: lisp assumption validation

2011-03-10 Thread Ana Zgombic
Cheers Alex. thank you. On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: Hi Ana, is it safe to assume that all (if not most) code in lisp is a function (or is it procedure) call? Yes, I would say so. I must confess that personally I don't pay much attention